From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vladislav Bolkhovitin Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE]: Comparison of features sets between different SCSI targets (SCST, STGT, IET, LIO) Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 11:32:39 +0400 Message-ID: <49D9B017.4080807@vlnb.net> References: <49D7AD54.4060408@vlnb.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:52266 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751915AbZDFHcq (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Apr 2009 03:32:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: ronnie sahlberg Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, scst-devel , iscsitarget-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, stgt@vger.kernel.org, James Bottomley ronnie sahlberg, on 04/06/2009 07:19 AM wrote: > Maybe you should also show which device types each implementation can > emulate. OK. Seems I should add than STGT has additional emulation for SMC and SSC devices as "Under development", correct? > On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin > wrote: > > Hi All, > > I set up http://scst.sourceforge.net/comparison.html page, which > compares features of existing SCSI target subsystems for Linux. The > comparison includes SCST, STGT, IET and LIO. > > I might be not fully correct somewhere, so, if you don't agree with > me about some item(s) in the comparison table, please let me know > and I will fix that. > > Vlad > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > >