All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marian Jancar <m.jancar@satca.net>
To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: gcc: mips32 vs mips3
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:21:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DA0FE3.1070400@satca.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090309193902.GA993@linux-mips.org>

Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 05:55:10PM +0100, Marian Jancar wrote:
> 
>> which option is supposed to compile faster code, -mips3 or -mips32?
> 
> That question doesn't quite make sense.   A MIPS32 processor can't execute
> MIPS III code and a MIPS III processor can't execute MIPS32 code.  Only a
> MIPS64 processor could execute code compiled for either MIPS32 or MIPS III.
> So choose the option to match the architecture of your processor.

The processor in question is the processos in the Atheros 802.11 SoC 
AR5312, 4Kc AFAIK.
OpenWRT uses -mips32 for this target but the GPL SDK for NanoStation
uses -march=r4600. Both options produce code that runs without oops
or any other immediately manifested issues.
So you are right, the correct question is "-mips32 vs -march=r4600".
I got confused because I left some bits compiled with -march=4600 when
recompiling with -mips32 and gcc complained about it being compiled
for MIPS III when linking.

Marian

# cat /proc/cpuinfo
system type             : Atheros AR2313
processor               : 0
cpu model               : MIPS 4Kc V0.10
BogoMIPS                : 179.40
wait instruction        : yes
microsecond timers      : yes
tlb_entries             : 16
extra interrupt vector  : yes
hardware watchpoint     : yes
ASEs implemented        :
VCED exceptions         : not available
VCEI exceptions         : not available

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-06 14:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-06 16:55 gcc: mips32 vs mips3 Marian Jancar
2009-03-09 19:39 ` Ralf Baechle
2009-04-06 14:21   ` Marian Jancar [this message]
2009-04-06 14:30     ` Ralf Baechle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49DA0FE3.1070400@satca.net \
    --to=m.jancar@satca.net \
    --cc=linux-mips@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.