Re: [ANNOUNCE]: Comparison of features sets between different SCSI targets (SCST, STGT, IET, LIO)

[Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>]

ronnie sahlberg, on 04/06/2009 02:19 PM wrote:
> Why is AEN so important that it is worth 4 entries? SCST is the only 
> target where this is supported.

About the related functionality see http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/3/26/290

> Has AEN not been replaced with sense codes nowadays anyway?

AEN, particularly, is one of the ways to deliver those sense codes

> Support for Asynchronous Event Notifications (AEN) 	+ 	- 	- 	-

This is about the AEN infrastructure in the target's core

> AEN for devices added/removed 	+ 	- 	- 	-
> AEN for devices resized 	+ 	- 	- 	-

Those two are about ability to generate particular events

> 
> 
> 
> Support for Asynchronous Event Notifications (AEN) 	+ 	- 	- 	-

This is about support for AENs delivery by target driver.

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 5:56 AM, Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net 
> <mailto:vst@vlnb.net>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi All,
> 
>     I set up http://scst.sourceforge.net/comparison.html page, which
>     compares features of existing SCSI target subsystems for Linux. The
>     comparison includes SCST, STGT, IET and LIO.
> 
>     I might be not fully correct somewhere, so, if you don't agree with
>     me about some item(s) in the comparison table, please let me know
>     and I will fix that.
> 
>     Vlad
>     --
>     To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stgt" in
>     the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>     <mailto:majordomo@vger.kernel.org>
>     More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
>