From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <49DA62A9.9060703@manicmethod.com> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:14:33 -0400 From: Joshua Brindle MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hasan Rezaul-CHR010 CC: Stephen Smalley , selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, Cheng Heilung-HCHENG1 Subject: Re: SELinux packages version (svn2950)... References: <49D1DA85.1030902@ak.jp.nec.com> <49D4743C.2010000@ak.jp.nec.com> <49D4CB6E.1090900@manicmethod.com> <1238684951.32379.311.camel@gorn.columbia.tresys.com> <49D563A9.1000607@ak.jp.nec.com> <49D965CA.4030908@ak.jp.nec.com> <49DA559C.7040400@manicmethod.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Hasan Rezaul-CHR010 wrote: > We get our Linux OS and filesystem packaged from a third-party company. > These are the versions of the SELinux packages included in the bundle. > The version number looked a bit strange to me, so I wanted to check with > the selinux community... > > So are you saying this "svn2950" version doesn't officially exist > anymore, and its *NOT* a stable and tested version ? > svn 2950 was the last revision we had in the subversion tree on sourceforge. We have since moved to git on userspace.selinuxproject.org. There was never a release rolled from that revision in subversion as far as I know. Therefore yes, it does not officially exist, except as the first checkin to our git tree, and was not released as stable. > Thanks, > > - Rezaul. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joshua Brindle [mailto:method@manicmethod.com] > Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 2:19 PM > To: Hasan Rezaul-CHR010 > Cc: Stephen Smalley; selinux@tycho.nsa.gov > Subject: Re: SELinux packages version (svn2950)... > > Hasan Rezaul-CHR010 wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I work on a product that uses Linux Kernel 2.6.21. As such, I am >> currently using the following SELinux libs and related package > versions: >> audit 1.5.3 >> checkpolicy 1.33.1 >> libselinux 2.0.13 >> libsemanage 2.0.1 >> libsepol 2.0.3 >> libsetrans 0.1.18 >> policycoreutils 2.0.16 >> >> >> >> We are considering moving upto Linux Kernel 2.6.27, and as such we >> would automatically get upgraded to the following package versions: >> >> audit 1.7.2 >> checkpolicy svn2950 >> libselinux svn2950 >> libsemanage svn2950 >> libsepol svn2950 >> libsetrans N/A >> policycoreutils svn2950 >> >> >> ** My questions are: >> >> 1. Do all the packages of version (svn2950) play nicely together ? >> 2. What are the major advantages of upgrading to svn2950 ? >> 3. Are there any disadvantages, or any changes that I should be aware >> or cencerned about ? >> 4. Why is the version number so drastically different ? Is this a >> result of a totally new effort ? >> 5. Please feel free to share any thoughts / suggestions / advice as >> far as upgrading to this newer version... >> >> Thanks in advance for all your help. >> > > There is no subversion repository anymore, all the subversion repos > should be down at this point, where did you find that revision? > > The packages are now in git at http://userspace.selinuxproject.org/ and > a release was just made at > http://userspace.selinuxproject.org/trac/wiki/Releases . > -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.