From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mummy.ncsc.mil (mummy.ncsc.mil [144.51.88.129]) by tarius.tycho.ncsc.mil (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n36KbbnH025980 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 16:37:37 -0400 Received: from manicmethod.com (jazzhorn.ncsc.mil [144.51.5.9]) by mummy.ncsc.mil (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id n36KbaXb003741 for ; Mon, 6 Apr 2009 20:37:36 GMT Message-ID: <49DA680A.1060102@manicmethod.com> Date: Mon, 06 Apr 2009 16:37:30 -0400 From: Joshua Brindle MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hasan Rezaul-CHR010 CC: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, Cheng Heilung-HCHENG1 Subject: Re: SELinux packages version (svn2950)... References: <49D1DA85.1030902@ak.jp.nec.com> <49D4743C.2010000@ak.jp.nec.com> <49D4CB6E.1090900@manicmethod.com> <1238684951.32379.311.camel@gorn.columbia.tresys.com> <49D563A9.1000607@ak.jp.nec.com> <49D965CA.4030908@ak.jp.nec.com> <49DA559C.7040400@manicmethod.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Sender: owner-selinux@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: selinux@tycho.nsa.gov Hasan Rezaul-CHR010 wrote: > Thanks so much :-) > > So the versions below are the latest and greatest, and officially stable > and tested ? > > checkpolicy-2.0.19 > libselinux-2.0.79 > libsemanage-2.0.31 > libsepol-2.0.36 > policycoreutils-2.0.62 > sepolgen-1.0.16 > > - Rezaul. > They are official releases from the upstream project and are the latest and greatest. The testing upstream has unit tests and some integration tests but most of our testing comes from rawhide users after Dan Walsh has pulled the packages in to rawhide (which he has). > > -----Original Message----- > From: Hasan Rezaul-CHR010 > Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 2:49 PM > To: 'Joshua Brindle' > Cc: Stephen Smalley; selinux@tycho.nsa.gov; Cheng Heilung-HCHENG1 > Subject: RE: SELinux packages version (svn2950)... > > We get our Linux OS and filesystem packaged from a third-party company. > These are the versions of the SELinux packages included in the bundle. > The version number looked a bit strange to me, so I wanted to check with > the selinux community... > > So are you saying this "svn2950" version doesn't officially exist > anymore, and its *NOT* a stable and tested version ? > > Thanks, > > - Rezaul. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Joshua Brindle [mailto:method@manicmethod.com] > Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 2:19 PM > To: Hasan Rezaul-CHR010 > Cc: Stephen Smalley; selinux@tycho.nsa.gov > Subject: Re: SELinux packages version (svn2950)... > > Hasan Rezaul-CHR010 wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I work on a product that uses Linux Kernel 2.6.21. As such, I am >> currently using the following SELinux libs and related package > versions: >> audit 1.5.3 >> checkpolicy 1.33.1 >> libselinux 2.0.13 >> libsemanage 2.0.1 >> libsepol 2.0.3 >> libsetrans 0.1.18 >> policycoreutils 2.0.16 >> >> >> >> We are considering moving upto Linux Kernel 2.6.27, and as such we >> would automatically get upgraded to the following package versions: >> >> audit 1.7.2 >> checkpolicy svn2950 >> libselinux svn2950 >> libsemanage svn2950 >> libsepol svn2950 >> libsetrans N/A >> policycoreutils svn2950 >> >> >> ** My questions are: >> >> 1. Do all the packages of version (svn2950) play nicely together ? >> 2. What are the major advantages of upgrading to svn2950 ? >> 3. Are there any disadvantages, or any changes that I should be aware >> or cencerned about ? >> 4. Why is the version number so drastically different ? Is this a >> result of a totally new effort ? >> 5. Please feel free to share any thoughts / suggestions / advice as >> far as upgrading to this newer version... >> >> Thanks in advance for all your help. >> > > There is no subversion repository anymore, all the subversion repos > should be down at this point, where did you find that revision? > > The packages are now in git at http://userspace.selinuxproject.org/ and > a release was just made at > http://userspace.selinuxproject.org/trac/wiki/Releases . > -- This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list. If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.