Re: no commit allowed under discussion

[phcoder <phcoder@gmail.com>]

Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2009 01:43:17 Bean wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 8:53 PM, Bean <bean123ch@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Yoshinori K. Okuji <okuji@enbug.org> 
> wrote:
>>>> I've undone r2063, since we're still discussing how to / not to split
>>>> modules. Bean, you must respect teamwork. If you are unable to follow
>>>> such a fundamental rule, I will have to disable your permission.
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I thought the previous mail is about replacing grub_printf with
>>> grub_dprint, I'm ok with that. This patch has been in mail list for
>>> sometime, it is essential to get a working display in intel macs.
>> Hi,
>>
>> How about this patch ? The split is necessary as it introduces new
>> command loadbios and fakebios that uses the fake_bios_data function,
>> and it would be ugly to put them all inside linux.c.
> 
> Do you have any strong reason to make loadbios and fakebios separate? I think 
> the overhead is negligible.
>

this module is useful in conjunction with other loaders (multiboot, bsd, 
pc_chainloader) as well

> Regards,
> Okuji
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Grub-devel mailing list
> Grub-devel@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel


-- 

Regards
Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko