All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ray Lee <ray-lk@madrabbit.org>, Hua Zhong <hzhong@gmail.com>,
	Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8][RFC] IO latency/throughput fixes
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:35:52 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DB56B8.1060805@rtr.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904061604410.8214@localhost.localdomain>

Linus Torvalds wrote:
..
>  - If I did this right, this _only_ overrides the data mode if it's not 
>    explicitly specified on disk in the superblock mount options.
> 
> IOW, if you have done a 
> 
> 	tune2fs -o journal_data_ordered
> 
> then this will _not_ override that.
..

Thanks for saving me time to look up that command!  :)

With the stuff I work on here, kernel oops and sudden reboots
are not at all uncommon during development, and I really prefer
to keep "ordered" as the default on these machines for a tiny
extra margin of safety.

What happens with ext3 "writeback", and ext4 "whatever",
when one does the quickie reboot method:

   ALT-SYSRQ-S ALT-SYSRQ-U ALT-SYSRQ-S ALT-SYSRQ-B

???

Cheers

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-07 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-06 12:48 [PATCH 0/8][RFC] IO latency/throughput fixes Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 1/8] block: change the request allocation/congestion logic to be sync/async based Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 2/8] Add WRITE_SYNC_PLUG and SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 3/8] block: fsync_buffers_list() should use SWRITE_SYNC_PLUG Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 4/8] jbd: use WRITE_SYNC_PLUG instead of WRITE_SYNC Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 5/8] jbd2: " Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 6/8] block: enabling plugging on SSD devices that don't do queuing Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 7/8] block: Add flag for telling the IO schedulers NOT to anticipate more IO Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 12:48 ` [PATCH 8/8] block: switch sync_dirty_buffer() over to WRITE_SYNC Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 13:04 ` [PATCH 0/8][RFC] IO latency/throughput fixes Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 13:13   ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 15:37   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-06 16:57     ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-07  3:28     ` Chris Mason
2009-04-06 15:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-06 15:10   ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 15:45     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-06 17:01       ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-06 18:31       ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-06 19:57         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-06 20:10           ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-06 21:26             ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-06 20:12           ` Hua Zhong
2009-04-06 20:20             ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-06 21:19             ` Theodore Tso
2009-04-06 21:35               ` Hua Zhong
2009-04-06 22:04                 ` Ray Lee
2009-04-06 22:17                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-06 23:10                     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-07  7:51                       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2009-04-07 10:36                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-07 14:10                           ` Diego Calleja
2009-04-08 12:04                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-08 12:56                           ` Denys Vlasenko
2009-04-08 13:27                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-07 13:35                       ` Mark Lord [this message]
2009-04-07 14:33                         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-07 19:24                           ` Mark Lord
2009-04-07 19:45                             ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-07 20:53                           ` Mike Galbraith
2009-04-09  2:40                       ` Eric Sandeen
2009-04-09 14:01                         ` Ric Wheeler
2009-04-06 22:25                   ` Hua Zhong
2009-04-06 22:48                     ` Ray Lee
2009-04-06 22:52                       ` Hua Zhong
2009-04-06 23:19                       ` Alan Cox
2009-04-07  3:52               ` Chris Mason
2009-04-07  4:13                 ` Trenton D. Adams
2009-04-07  4:27                   ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-07  4:48                     ` Trenton D. Adams
2009-04-07  5:02                       ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-07  5:23                         ` Hua Zhong
2009-04-07  6:27                         ` Trenton D. Adams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49DB56B8.1060805@rtr.ca \
    --to=lkml@rtr.ca \
    --cc=hzhong@gmail.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ray-lk@madrabbit.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.