From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] early-quirks: remove duplicate #ifdef
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:02:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49DCD8BE.2090408@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090408121757.GA18581@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
>
>
>> "#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC)" was repeated
>> twice.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
>>
>
> hm, this was due to the patch below. Your patch essentially reverts
> that patch?
>
Is that patch the result of a merge?
With that patch in place, the code structure is essentially:
#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC)
#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC)
static u32 __init ati_ixp4x0_rev(int num, int slot, int func)
{
...
}
#endif
...
#endif
I can't see how the inner #if is doing anything useful at all.
J
> Ingo
>
> --------------->
> From a59dacfdc9ba06903652fa4883bf1106278b18ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:38:08 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] x86 early quirks: eliminate unused function
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>
> Impact: cleanup
>
> this warning:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c:99: warning: ‘ati_ixp4x0_rev’ defined but not used
>
> triggers because ati_ixp4x0_rev() is only used in the
> ACPI && X86_IO_APIC case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> index 76b8cd9..ebdb85c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ static void __init nvidia_bugs(int num, int slot, int func)
> }
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC)
> +#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC)
> static u32 __init ati_ixp4x0_rev(int num, int slot, int func)
> {
> u32 d;
> @@ -114,6 +115,7 @@ static u32 __init ati_ixp4x0_rev(int num, int slot, int func)
> d &= 0xff;
> return d;
> }
> +#endif
>
> static void __init ati_bugs(int num, int slot, int func)
> {
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-08 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-06 22:11 [PATCH] early-quirks: remove duplicate #ifdef Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2009-04-08 12:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-08 17:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49DCD8BE.2090408@goop.org \
--to=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.