From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alan Jenkins Subject: Re: [PATCH] rfkill: document removal of notifier chain Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 18:21:50 +0100 Message-ID: <49DCDD2E.80705@tuffmail.co.uk> References: <49DCA88E.6060400@tuffmail.co.uk> (sfid-20090408_153722_059382_FB44D658) <1239204090.16477.1.camel@johannes.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "John W. Linville" , Ivo van Doorn , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Berg Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.158]:44646 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754601AbZDHRVz (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Apr 2009 13:21:55 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 16so574786fgg.17 for ; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:21:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1239204090.16477.1.camel@johannes.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Johannes Berg wrote: > On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 14:37 +0100, Alan Jenkins wrote: > >> This unused feature was removed in 4dec9b807be757780ca3611a959ac22c28d292a7 >> >> Signed-off-by: Alan Jenkins >> --- >> >> p.s. Is netdev really the right list for rfkill (as listed in MAINTAINERS)? >> I have a feeling most development happens on linux-wireless. >> > > You're right, and I'm rewriting rfkill and part of that is changing the > maintainer to myself and the list to linux-wireless. > Good luck! I'll try to have a look at your patch, to see how (if) it would affect the benighted eeepc-laptop. > I have no problems with this patch, but note that I'm rewriting that > entire file as well so it's not really necessary in the long run -- now > that -rc1 is out I can hopefully convert all in-tree rfkill stuff and > get the patch in. > Heh, ok. Alan