From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: jim owens <jowens@hp.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Converting system to raid
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 07:11:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E1CC6F.7020409@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49E0D60E.7040904@hp.com>
jim owens wrote:
> Jeff Garzik wrote:
>> jim owens wrote:
>>> nanosecond time stamps are a myth!
>>
>> Not true, in the age of NO_HZ...
>
> While nanosecond time is real on some hardware platforms,
> I don't know of any hard disk filesystem that does metadata
> updates at that level of granularity and guarantees distinct
> timestamps between writes at extremely short intervals.
>
> Even SSD performance would suck if we did that.
>
> The filesystem mod-time might have nanoseconds in it, but
> that does not mean 2 writes 100 nanoseconds apart will have
> different mod-times.
Modern Linux filesystems absolutely do do metadata updates at that level
of granularity.
Are you guaranteed district timestamps between writes? No, but then
again, metadata updates were never guaranteed between two writes either.
You might just be dirtying a mmap'd page, for example.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-12 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-09 23:44 Converting system to raid Timothy D. Lenz
2009-04-10 9:10 ` KwangErn Liew
2009-04-10 9:55 ` CoolCold
2009-04-10 19:43 ` Timothy D. Lenz
2009-04-10 19:53 ` Robin Hill
2009-04-10 20:45 ` Timothy D. Lenz
2009-04-10 20:59 ` Robin Hill
2009-04-10 21:26 ` Timothy D. Lenz
2009-04-10 21:51 ` Robin Hill
2009-04-11 5:29 ` Timothy D. Lenz
2009-04-11 14:29 ` CoolCold
2009-04-11 18:47 ` Timothy D. Lenz
2009-04-12 0:53 ` Timothy D. Lenz
2009-04-12 11:11 ` Robin Hill
2009-04-12 19:55 ` Timothy D. Lenz
2009-04-14 9:30 ` Robin Hill
2009-04-17 0:47 ` Timothy D. Lenz
2009-04-17 7:49 ` Robin Hill
2009-04-11 14:36 ` Robin Hill
2009-04-11 15:04 ` jim owens
2009-04-11 15:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-11 17:40 ` jim owens
2009-04-12 11:11 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2009-04-12 16:43 ` jim owens
2009-04-12 17:18 ` Jeff Garzik
2009-04-10 13:22 ` Robin Hill
2009-04-10 19:22 ` Timothy D. Lenz
2009-04-10 19:50 ` Robin Hill
2009-04-11 4:40 ` Jon Lewis
2009-04-11 7:48 ` Jan Ceuleers
2009-04-11 8:50 ` Goswin von Brederlow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49E1CC6F.7020409@garzik.org \
--to=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=jowens@hp.com \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.