From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
To: qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RESEND][PATCH v2] x86: Enhanced dump of segment registers
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:33:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E306F4.6080807@web.de> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6864 bytes --]
Parse the descriptor flags that segment registers refer to and show the
result in a more human-friendly format. The output of info registers eg.
then looks like this:
[...]
ES =007b 00000000 ffffffff 00cff300 DPL=3 DS [-WA]
CS =0060 00000000 ffffffff 00c09b00 DPL=0 CS32 [-RA]
SS =0068 00000000 ffffffff 00c09300 DPL=0 DS [-WA]
DS =007b 00000000 ffffffff 00cff300 DPL=3 DS [-WA]
FS =0000 00000000 00000000 00000000
GS =0033 b7dd66c0 ffffffff b7dff3dd DPL=3 DS [-WA]
LDT=0000 00000000 00000000 00008200 DPL=0 LDT
TR =0080 c06da700 0000206b 00008900 DPL=0 TSS32-avl
[...]
Changes in this version:
- refactoring so that only a single helper is used for dumping the
segment descriptor cache
- tiny typo fixed that broke 64-bit segment type names
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
---
target-i386/cpu.h | 3 +-
target-i386/helper.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target-i386/cpu.h b/target-i386/cpu.h
index 90bceab..f38f194 100644
--- a/target-i386/cpu.h
+++ b/target-i386/cpu.h
@@ -82,9 +82,10 @@
#define DESC_AVL_MASK (1 << 20)
#define DESC_P_MASK (1 << 15)
#define DESC_DPL_SHIFT 13
-#define DESC_DPL_MASK (1 << DESC_DPL_SHIFT)
+#define DESC_DPL_MASK (3 << DESC_DPL_SHIFT)
#define DESC_S_MASK (1 << 12)
#define DESC_TYPE_SHIFT 8
+#define DESC_TYPE_MASK (15 << DESC_TYPE_SHIFT)
#define DESC_A_MASK (1 << 8)
#define DESC_CS_MASK (1 << 11) /* 1=code segment 0=data segment */
diff --git a/target-i386/helper.c b/target-i386/helper.c
index 8213703..5ce8798 100644
--- a/target-i386/helper.c
+++ b/target-i386/helper.c
@@ -570,6 +570,61 @@ static const char *cc_op_str[] = {
"SARQ",
};
+static void
+cpu_x86_dump_seg_cache(CPUState *env, FILE *f,
+ int (*cpu_fprintf)(FILE *f, const char *fmt, ...),
+ const char *name, struct SegmentCache *sc)
+{
+#ifdef TARGET_X86_64
+ if (env->hflags & HF_CS64_MASK) {
+ cpu_fprintf(f, "%-3s=%04x %016" PRIx64 " %08x %08x", name,
+ sc->selector, sc->base, sc->limit, sc->flags);
+ } else
+#endif
+ {
+ cpu_fprintf(f, "%-3s=%04x %08x %08x %08x", name, sc->selector,
+ (uint32_t)sc->base, sc->limit, sc->flags);
+ }
+
+ if (!(env->hflags & HF_PE_MASK) || !(sc->flags & DESC_P_MASK))
+ goto done;
+
+ cpu_fprintf(f, " DPL=%d ", (sc->flags & DESC_DPL_MASK) >> DESC_DPL_SHIFT);
+ if (sc->flags & DESC_S_MASK) {
+ if (sc->flags & DESC_CS_MASK) {
+ cpu_fprintf(f, (sc->flags & DESC_L_MASK) ? "CS64" :
+ ((sc->flags & DESC_B_MASK) ? "CS32" : "CS16"));
+ cpu_fprintf(f, " [%c%c", (sc->flags & DESC_C_MASK) ? 'C' : '-',
+ (sc->flags & DESC_R_MASK) ? 'R' : '-');
+ } else {
+ cpu_fprintf(f, (sc->flags & DESC_B_MASK) ? "DS " : "DS16");
+ cpu_fprintf(f, " [%c%c", (sc->flags & DESC_E_MASK) ? 'E' : '-',
+ (sc->flags & DESC_W_MASK) ? 'W' : '-');
+ }
+ cpu_fprintf(f, "%c]", (sc->flags & DESC_A_MASK) ? 'A' : '-');
+ } else {
+ static const char *sys_type_name[2][16] = {
+ { /* 32 bit mode */
+ "Reserved", "TSS16-avl", "LDT", "TSS16-busy",
+ "CallGate16", "TaskGate", "IntGate16", "TrapGate16",
+ "Reserved", "TSS32-avl", "Reserved", "TSS32-busy",
+ "CallGate32", "Reserved", "IntGate32", "TrapGate32"
+ },
+ { /* 64 bit mode */
+ "<hiword>", "Reserved", "LDT", "Reserved", "Reserved",
+ "Reserved", "Reserved", "Reserved", "Reserved",
+ "TSS64-avl", "Reserved", "TSS64-busy", "CallGate64",
+ "Reserved", "IntGate64", "TrapGate64"
+ }
+ };
+ cpu_fprintf(f, sys_type_name[(env->hflags & HF_LMA_MASK) ? 1 : 0]
+ [(sc->flags & DESC_TYPE_MASK)
+ >> DESC_TYPE_SHIFT]);
+ }
+done:
+ cpu_fprintf(f, "\n");
+}
+
void cpu_dump_state(CPUState *env, FILE *f,
int (*cpu_fprintf)(FILE *f, const char *fmt, ...),
int flags)
@@ -648,27 +703,15 @@ void cpu_dump_state(CPUState *env, FILE *f,
env->halted);
}
+ for(i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
+ cpu_x86_dump_seg_cache(env, f, cpu_fprintf, seg_name[i],
+ &env->segs[i]);
+ }
+ cpu_x86_dump_seg_cache(env, f, cpu_fprintf, "LDT", &env->ldt);
+ cpu_x86_dump_seg_cache(env, f, cpu_fprintf, "TR", &env->tr);
+
#ifdef TARGET_X86_64
if (env->hflags & HF_LMA_MASK) {
- for(i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
- SegmentCache *sc = &env->segs[i];
- cpu_fprintf(f, "%s =%04x %016" PRIx64 " %08x %08x\n",
- seg_name[i],
- sc->selector,
- sc->base,
- sc->limit,
- sc->flags);
- }
- cpu_fprintf(f, "LDT=%04x %016" PRIx64 " %08x %08x\n",
- env->ldt.selector,
- env->ldt.base,
- env->ldt.limit,
- env->ldt.flags);
- cpu_fprintf(f, "TR =%04x %016" PRIx64 " %08x %08x\n",
- env->tr.selector,
- env->tr.base,
- env->tr.limit,
- env->tr.flags);
cpu_fprintf(f, "GDT= %016" PRIx64 " %08x\n",
env->gdt.base, env->gdt.limit);
cpu_fprintf(f, "IDT= %016" PRIx64 " %08x\n",
@@ -685,25 +728,6 @@ void cpu_dump_state(CPUState *env, FILE *f,
} else
#endif
{
- for(i = 0; i < 6; i++) {
- SegmentCache *sc = &env->segs[i];
- cpu_fprintf(f, "%s =%04x %08x %08x %08x\n",
- seg_name[i],
- sc->selector,
- (uint32_t)sc->base,
- sc->limit,
- sc->flags);
- }
- cpu_fprintf(f, "LDT=%04x %08x %08x %08x\n",
- env->ldt.selector,
- (uint32_t)env->ldt.base,
- env->ldt.limit,
- env->ldt.flags);
- cpu_fprintf(f, "TR =%04x %08x %08x %08x\n",
- env->tr.selector,
- (uint32_t)env->tr.base,
- env->tr.limit,
- env->tr.flags);
cpu_fprintf(f, "GDT= %08x %08x\n",
(uint32_t)env->gdt.base, env->gdt.limit);
cpu_fprintf(f, "IDT= %08x %08x\n",
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 257 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2009-04-13 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-13 9:33 Jan Kiszka [this message]
2009-04-18 15:41 ` [Qemu-devel] [RESEND][PATCH v2] x86: Enhanced dump of segment registers Anthony Liguori
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49E306F4.6080807@web.de \
--to=jan.kiszka@web.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.