From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: more findings/questions on vlans/bonds Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:17:42 +0300 Message-ID: <49E73E06.5030708@Voltaire.com> References: <5325.1239113639@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jay Vosburgh Return-path: Received: from fwil.voltaire.com ([193.47.165.2]:29712 "EHLO exil.voltaire.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753058AbZDPORq (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:17:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <5325.1239113639@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: >> I played a bit with bonding vlans (2.6.29 active-backup mode) and it >> doesn't seem to work - specifically, I noted that bonding doesn't issue >> fail-over after I changed the current slave link status to down ("ifconfig >> eth0.4001 down"). I suspect that the carrier based link monitoring scheme >> is broken wrt to vlan devices [...] >> I also played with a post 2.6.29 cut of Linus tree, and I couldn't bond vlans. Hi Jay, Did you had the chance to look into the bonding-vlan-devices related issues I came across when doing these tests? Or.