From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Subject: Re: Re: NX related build failure in latest pv_ops dom0
	hackery tree
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:34:46 -0700
Message-ID: <49E75E26.1040803@goop.org>
References: <20090404192338.GJ24960@edu.joroinen.fi>	
	<49D840D4.1070701@goop.org>
	<1239555359.12706.4.camel@leto.intern.saout.de>	
	<49E4BF6F.2010308@goop.org>	
	<1239887761.30384.13.camel@leto.intern.saout.de>	
	<49E7591E.3030402@goop.org>
	<1239899080.30384.138.camel@leto.intern.saout.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com>
In-Reply-To: <1239899080.30384.138.camel@leto.intern.saout.de>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com
To: Christophe Saout <christophe@saout.de>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Christophe Saout wrote:
> I will try to get some kernel messages and also check if the latest
> hackery kernel boots.
>
>   

But yes, comparing hackery vs xen-tip is a useful exercise.

    J