From: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: simplify I/O stat accounting
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:03:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E837EC.5000202@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090416164253.GU5178@kernel.dk>
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 16 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 16 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Apr 16 2009, Jerome Marchand wrote:
>>>>> This simplifies I/O stat accounting switching code and separates it
>>>>> completely from I/O scheduler switch code.
>>>>>
>>>>> Requests are accounted according to the state of their request queue
>>>>> at the time of the request allocation. There is no need anymore to
>>>>> flush the request queue when switching I/O accounting state.
>>>> This is cleaner, I like it. I'll apply it, but I'm changing this one:
>>>>
>>>>> @@ -792,9 +792,10 @@ static struct request *get_request(struct
>>>>> request_queue *q, int rw_flags,
>>>>> if (priv)
>>>>> rl->elvpriv++;
>>>>>
>>>>> + iostat = blk_queue_io_stat(q) ? REQ_IO_STAT : 0;
>>>>> spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock);
>>>> to a regular if, I hate these ?: constructs. An if is much more
>>>> readable, imho.
>>> Grmbl, your patch is line wrapped. Please fix your mailer.
>> And it doesn't apply to current -git. Looks like a hand apply, but
>> please be a little more careful in the future.
>
> OK, it doesn't even compile either:
>
> +#define blk_rq_io_stat(rq) ((rq)->flags & REQ_IO_STAT)
>
> that wants to be ->cmd_flags.
>
> Please resend when you have something that at least compiles. If you
> send untested stuff my way, at least tell me.
>
Hi Jens,
I'm very sorry about this. I didn't send you a patch which does not
compiles on purpose. I was working on backporting that patch on an older
version of the kernel. It looks like I hand-edited that patch by mistake
before I sent it to you.
Jérôme
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-17 8:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-16 13:14 [PATCH] block: simplify I/O stat accounting Jerome Marchand
2009-04-16 16:34 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-16 16:37 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-16 16:38 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-16 16:42 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-17 8:03 ` Jerome Marchand [this message]
2009-04-17 11:21 ` [PATCH v2] " Jerome Marchand
2009-04-17 11:37 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-17 11:54 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-17 12:24 ` Jerome Marchand
2009-04-17 12:30 ` Jens Axboe
2009-04-21 13:32 ` [PATCH v3] " Jerome Marchand
2009-04-22 12:16 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49E837EC.5000202@redhat.com \
--to=jmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.