All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ric Wheeler <rwheeler@redhat.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
	device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] new barriers - 2
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:26:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E891B0.4080103@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <170fa0d20901300904l31d0c143ya02d6fb4de28c281@mail.gmail.com>

Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@wpkg.org> wrote:
>   
>>> Here I announce 2nd version my new barrier support patches:
>>> http://people.redhat.com/mpatocka/patches/kernel/barriers/
>>>
>>> They are against 2.6.29-rc3.
>>>
>>> The most important enhancement is that with these patches, device mapper
>>> is able to send barrier requests to lower devices.
>>>       
>> I guess it still won't work for those using LVM on md (Linux software RAID)
>> because md lacks barrier support? Do you know if someone is working on it?
>>     
>
> md raid1 has supported barriers since 2.6.17
>
> But I'm not aware of any md work being done to support barriers in
> other raid levels.  Judging by Neil Brown's thoughts on the matter
> (from 2006) it would seem unlikely he is putting effort to it, please
> see the following thread:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=115321319003578&w=2
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=115335249503450&w=2
>
> cc'ing linux-raid to see if others have more insight
>   

Neil, Hannes,

Is Mike's assumption above still true - no plans/thoughts about doing 
barrier support for RAID5/6 and so on?

At least some things (the null barrier op) are in place now since your 
summary of a couple years back, does this make it easier?

Thanks!

Ric

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-17 14:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-30 10:15 [PATCHES] new barriers - 2 Tomasz Chmielewski
2009-01-30 17:04 ` [dm-devel] " Mike Snitzer
2009-04-17 14:26   ` Ric Wheeler [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-01-29 14:43 Mikulas Patocka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49E891B0.4080103@redhat.com \
    --to=rwheeler@redhat.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=snitzer@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.