From: Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: rfkill rewrite bug
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 09:17:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E98C86.2040308@tuffmail.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1239741968.4205.1.camel@johannes.local>
Johannes Berg wrote:
> I think I fixed that now, I allowed using set_sw_state before register
> and that didn't go too well with the LED system w/o any checks.
>
> johannes
>
Ok, I retried with v6. It seemed to work well enough; my wireless
toggle key worked and either state was preserved over suspend and
hibernation.
When I looked at the code earlier, I saw no obvious replacement for
rfkill_set_default(). So I tried disabling the wireless and rebooting
to see what happened. It didn't like that :-).
[ 3.258061] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 3.258160] kernel BUG at kernel/workqueue.c:192!
[ 3.258256] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
[ 3.258391] last sysfs file: /sys/module/backlight/initstate
[ 3.258489] Modules linked in: video(+) output eeepc_laptop(+)
backlight ac battery rfkill but
ton processor evdev thermal fan ata_generic
[ 3.259261]
[ 3.259346] Pid: 1571, comm: modprobe Not tainted (2.6.30-rc2-wleeepc
#13) 701
[ 3.259482] EIP: 0060:[<c0129e0a>] EFLAGS: 00010203 CPU: 0
[ 3.259590] EIP is at queue_work_on+0x1a/0x31
[ 3.259687] EAX: df089730 EBX: df00a060 ECX: df08972c EDX: 00000000
[ 3.259790] ESI: e0045f54 EDI: df284800 EBP: df361e3c ESP: df361e38
[ 3.259893] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
[ 3.259996] Process modprobe (pid: 1571, ti=df360000 task=de853c00
task.ti=df360000)
[ 3.260131] Stack:
[ 3.260160] df089600 df361e44 c0129e41 df361e4c c0129e52 df361e5c
e00125f7 00010000
[ 3.260160] df09c400 df361e80 e00458b9 00000000 00000200 00000010
de59ae90 df284800
[ 3.260160] ffffffed e0047474 df361e9c c02116c3 df2849fc ffffffda
df2849fc f
fffffed
[ 3.260160] Call Trace:
[ 3.260160] [<c0129e41>] ? queue_work+0xe/0x10
[ 3.260160] [<c0129e52>] ? schedule_work+0xf/0x11
[ 3.260160] [<e00125f7>] ? rfkill_set_sw_state+0x4c/0x69 [rfkill]
[ 3.260160] [<e00458b9>] ? eeepc_hotk_add+0x2c7/0x3ec [eeepc_laptop]
[ 3.260160] [<c02116c3>] ? acpi_device_probe+0x44/0x127
[ 3.260160] [<c0249719>] ? driver_probe_device+0x7f/0xf2
[ 3.260160] [<c02497cf>] ? __driver_attach+0x43/0x5f
[ 3.260160] [<c0248dcb>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x39/0x5a
[ 3.260160] [<c02495ec>] ? driver_attach+0x14/0x16
[ 3.260160] [<c024978c>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0x5f
[ 3.260160] [<c02492cf>] ? bus_add_driver+0xd7/0x1e7
[ 3.260160] [<c02499d5>] ? driver_register+0x7b/0xd7
[ 3.260160] [<c0212d44>] ? acpi_bus_register_driver+0x3a/0x3c
[ 3.260160] [<e004a022>] ? eeepc_laptop_init+0x22/0x1b9 [eeepc_laptop]
[ 3.260160] [<c0101131>] ? _stext+0x49/0x10b
[ 3.260160] [<e004a000>] ? eeepc_laptop_init+0x0/0x1b9 [eeepc_laptop]
[ 3.260160] [<c012f476>] ? __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x40/0x4c
[ 3.260160] [<c013a738>] ? sys_init_module+0x87/0x18f
[ 3.260160] [<c0102804>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x22
[ 3.260160] Code: 83 e2 fc 8b 4a 14 89 c2 8b 01 e8 d9 ff ff ff 5d c3
55 89 e5 53 89 d3 0f ba 29 00 19 c0 31 d2 85 c0 75 1a 8d 41 04 39 41 04
74 04 <0f> 0b eb fe 8b 03 89 ca e8 b0 ff ff ff ba 01 00 00 00 5b 89 d0
[ 3.260160] EIP: [<c0129e0a>] queue_work_on+0x1a/0x31 SS:ESP
0068:df361e38
[ 3.269670] ---[ end trace f8b6941350b5e97c ]---
Thanks
Alan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-18 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-08 13:37 [PATCH] rfkill: document removal of notifier chain Alan Jenkins
2009-04-08 15:21 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-08 17:21 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-04-13 19:00 ` rfkill rewrite bug Alan Jenkins
2009-04-13 18:56 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-14 20:46 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-18 8:17 ` Alan Jenkins [this message]
2009-04-18 8:15 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-18 8:28 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-18 9:43 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-04-18 12:24 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-18 13:29 ` Rfkill rewrite: eeepc-laptop resume Alan Jenkins
2009-04-18 13:33 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-18 14:02 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-04-18 14:10 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-18 15:49 ` rfkill rewrite bug Alan Jenkins
2009-04-18 15:57 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-18 17:48 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-04-18 17:57 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-18 18:03 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-04-18 17:42 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-04-18 17:59 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-20 8:33 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-04-20 8:44 ` Johannes Berg
2009-04-20 9:20 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-04-20 11:28 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49E98C86.2040308@tuffmail.co.uk \
--to=alan-jenkins@tuffmail.co.uk \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.