From: "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com>
To: Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
Cc: john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Dynamic Tick: Allow 32-bit machines to sleep for more than 2.15 seconds
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:30:04 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49EF37FC.8020909@nortel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49EE89EF.1000707@ti.com>
Jon Hunter wrote:
> So this
> assumes that long long will be a 64-bit type which I don't like.
> However, this would not cause any compilation issues even if long long
> turned out to be 32-bits or 128-bits (if this is even possible).
Isn't "long long" guaranteed to be 64-bit on all linux systems?
Unless the width is critical, I'd prefer to stay away from u64 until it
gets unified between architectures. I recently ran into a problem
printk-ing a "u64" value because it was a different type on ppc64 than
x86-64.
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-22 15:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-20 21:16 [RFC][PATCH] Dynamic Tick: Allow 32-bit machines to sleep for more than 2.15 seconds Jon Hunter
2009-04-21 6:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21 20:32 ` john stultz
2009-04-21 23:20 ` Jon Hunter
2009-04-22 0:02 ` john stultz
2009-05-07 14:52 ` Jon Hunter
2009-05-08 0:54 ` [RFC][PATCH] Dynamic Tick: Allow 32-bit machines to sleep formore " john stultz
2009-05-08 16:05 ` Jon Hunter
2009-05-09 0:51 ` [RFC][PATCH] Dynamic Tick: Allow 32-bit machines to sleep formorethan " john stultz
2009-05-12 23:35 ` Jon Hunter
2009-05-12 23:58 ` [RFC][PATCH] Dynamic Tick: Allow 32-bit machines to sleep formorethan2.15 seconds john stultz
2009-05-13 15:14 ` Jon Hunter
2009-05-13 16:41 ` John Stultz
2009-05-13 17:54 ` Jon Hunter
2009-05-13 19:21 ` John Stultz
2009-05-15 16:35 ` Jon Hunter
2009-05-15 18:55 ` Jon Hunter
2009-05-16 1:29 ` John Stultz
2009-05-16 1:18 ` John Stultz
2009-05-22 18:21 ` Jon Hunter
2009-05-22 19:23 ` john stultz
2009-05-22 19:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-05-26 15:12 ` Jon Hunter
2009-05-26 20:26 ` john stultz
2009-05-22 19:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2009-04-22 0:05 ` [RFC][PATCH] Dynamic Tick: Allow 32-bit machines to sleep for more than 2.15 seconds john stultz
2009-04-22 3:07 ` Jon Hunter
2009-04-22 15:30 ` Chris Friesen [this message]
2009-04-22 17:04 ` Jon Hunter
2009-04-22 18:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49EF37FC.8020909@nortel.com \
--to=cfriesen@nortel.com \
--cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
--cc=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.