From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LwfiJ-0005b6-Ex for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:54:23 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LwfiG-0005ag-2i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:54:23 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42324 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LwfiF-0005ad-Rp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:54:19 -0400 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:3139) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LwfiF-0006bc-Dy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:54:19 -0400 Message-ID: <49EF4BCB.5020301@eu.citrix.com> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:54:35 +0100 From: Stefano Stabellini MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] xen: pv domain support. References: <1240316408-15949-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <49EF3D28.50003@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <49EF3D28.50003@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Gerd Hoffmann , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Anthony Liguori wrote: > Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Next round, addressing review comments: >> >> * Fixup more "if (-1 == foo()) bar()" compare style. >> * Fixup logging: kill fprintf(stderr, ...), use logging API. >> * Kill some unneeded malloc failure checks. >> >> The patches are also rebased to latest git and got a few adaptions to >> recent cha >> > > Applied full series. Thanks. > > I think it can still use some love (some files missing > copyrights/license, for instance), but it's all extremely well contained > so there's little point in keeping it out of tree. > The point was for Ian to be able to pull directly from qemu without getting any conflicts on those files. To be honest they are fairly similar now, so I am confident that git will be able to do its magic. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/10] xen: pv domain support. Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:54:35 +0100 Message-ID: <49EF4BCB.5020301@eu.citrix.com> References: <1240316408-15949-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <49EF3D28.50003@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <49EF3D28.50003@codemonkey.ws> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Anthony Liguori Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" , Gerd Hoffmann , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Anthony Liguori wrote: > Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Next round, addressing review comments: >> >> * Fixup more "if (-1 == foo()) bar()" compare style. >> * Fixup logging: kill fprintf(stderr, ...), use logging API. >> * Kill some unneeded malloc failure checks. >> >> The patches are also rebased to latest git and got a few adaptions to >> recent cha >> > > Applied full series. Thanks. > > I think it can still use some love (some files missing > copyrights/license, for instance), but it's all extremely well contained > so there's little point in keeping it out of tree. > The point was for Ian to be able to pull directly from qemu without getting any conflicts on those files. To be honest they are fairly similar now, so I am confident that git will be able to do its magic.