From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Stroetmann OntoLab Subject: Re: reiser4 inclusion? Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 02:49:42 +0200 Message-ID: <49F25E26.3070805@ontolab.com> References: <200904250153.33258.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <49F25342.2020808@ontolab.com> <200904250235.52257.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200904250235.52257.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> Sender: reiserfs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Volker Armin Hemmann , reiserfs-devel Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb: > On Samstag 25 April 2009, you wrote: > >> Dear Volker Armin, >> >> >>> On Samstag 25 April 2009, Jason Todd Slack-Moehrle wrote: >>> >>>> Edward, >>>> >>>> >>>>> Please, >>>>> don't flood in this mailing list. >>>>> Go away! >>>>> >>>> You are totally out of line here. >>>> >>>> First, please following mailing list etiquette and don't top post >>>> >>> it is pretty much his mailing list. >>> >> And what? >> > > his mailing list his rules. Ah, really? Every day, there is something new to learn. > Also it is very impolite attacking people on their > own ml for breaking netiquette. Oh wait - it is impolite to attack people on > mailing lists for breaking netiquette - that is a break of it. ??? > > > >>>> Second, Christian, like all others, have a right to post here. You may >>>> not agree with his posts (or what he is doing with OntoFS), but that >>>> does not give you the right to tell him to go away. >>>> >>> yes, it does. Just look at the archives. >>> >> Ah, what? >> >> >>>> Third, if the community only relied on you to progress reiserfs, it >>>> has been years at this point and nothing significant. it is basically >>>> somewhat dead. >>>> >>> reiserfs is in maintenance mode - there aren't much changes. In fact, >>> less changes is a good thing. >>> >>> Edward is also pretty much the last person working on reiser4. You are >>> attacking him, but I don't see patches from you. Gives someone something >>> to think about. >>> >> Yes, but not in the sense you want us to direct to. >> > > hm, what do you want people to think? > When was the last time ontolabs sent patches to lkml for review or mm > inclusion? > Attacking Edward on the ml for being stubborn or not working enough doesn't > make you look good at all. Especially if he just acked a couple of patches a > few days ago and uploaded a patch for 2.6.29 shortly after its release. > Sorry, but once again You haven't caught the real problem. > > >>> look at the archives. Edward has good reasons to feel ripped of. >>> Maybe it is all a big miscommunication. But that isn't solved when >>> ontolabs guys agressively advertise for themselves. >>> >> It is no agressive advertisment by us. It is standard communication in >> an open source mailing list. >> > > from my POV it looks like agressive advertisement. If it is not intended that > way, structure and wording needs a lot of improvement. Luckily you are not the owner of the mailing-list Regards C. Stroetmann