All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@googlemail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy, was: there are non-DM6446 DaVinci chips
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:11:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F2B78B.7010607@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200904242357.29469.david-b@pacbell.net>

David Brownell wrote:
> On Friday 24 April 2009, Dirk Behme wrote:
>> Btw.: Now that -next exists, I can't find patch linked above in it, 
>> though :(
> 
>   http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next
> 
> shows it ... "respects SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT".  Make sure
> to look at the "next" branch there; you can start from
> 
>   http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git
> 
> Then page to the bottom, "heads" --> next, then shortlog.
> They're all there, except the dm9000 eeprom bugfix.

Sorry for being unclear. Yes, your Davinci patches are there. With 
'patch linked above' I meant

OMAP3: Remove legacy NAND defines
http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051111.html

which Jean-Christophe mentioned to apply against -next: "will be apply 
on the next".

Or did I miss it in

http://git.denx.de/?p=u-boot/u-boot-arm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/next

again? Please correct me then (and send me some more coffee) ;)

Best regards

Dirk

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-25  7:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-12 22:44 [U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot git] there are non-DM6446 DaVinci chips David Brownell
2009-04-17  5:44 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-17  6:31   ` David Brownell
2009-04-17  7:28     ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-18 21:00       ` David Brownell
2009-04-24 16:24     ` Hugo Villeneuve
2009-04-24 19:33       ` David Brownell
2009-04-24 21:45         ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-24 22:40           ` David Brownell
2009-04-25  5:17             ` [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy, was: " Dirk Behme
2009-04-25  6:27               ` Ben Warren
2009-04-25  7:03                 ` David Brownell
2009-04-25  7:18                   ` Ben Warren
2009-04-25  8:05                     ` David Brownell
2009-04-25 10:48                       ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 11:40                         ` Dirk Behme
2009-04-25 12:55                         ` [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy David Brownell
2009-04-25 13:53                           ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 18:53                             ` David Brownell
2009-04-26 21:38                               ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-27 13:44                         ` [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy, was: there are non-DM6446 DaVinci chips Jerry Van Baren
2009-04-27 14:00                           ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 10:30                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25  7:07                 ` [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy Dirk Behme
2009-04-25  7:42                   ` Ben Warren
2009-04-25 10:46                     ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 11:35                       ` Dirk Behme
2009-04-25 13:44                         ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-27 15:47                           ` Detlev Zundel
2009-04-27 19:42                             ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-28  8:32                               ` Detlev Zundel
2009-04-28  9:07                                 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 16:13                       ` Ben Warren
2009-04-26  5:15                       ` Dirk Behme
2009-04-25 10:41                   ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 17:08                   ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-25 17:30                     ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-04-25 18:02                       ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2009-04-25 18:55                     ` David Brownell
2009-04-25  6:57               ` [U-Boot] U-Boot ARM merge strategy, was: there are non-DM6446 DaVinci chips David Brownell
2009-04-25  7:11                 ` Dirk Behme [this message]
2009-04-24 23:46           ` [U-Boot] [PATCH u-boot git] " Ben Warren
2009-04-25  0:36             ` David Brownell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49F2B78B.7010607@googlemail.com \
    --to=dirk.behme@googlemail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.