Re: [Qemu-devel] branch and tag names

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

Anthony Liguori wrote:
>
> stable/0.10 feels a little awkward.  I never have gotten quite used to 
> this style of tagging (using file-like hierarchies).

It's useful if you have multiple categories of branches (personal 
development branches, formal maintenance branches, semi-formal branches 
for early sharing).  Probably not so important for the master repository.

>
> I'm not super opinionated about it either way.

Pity, it's even better bikeshedding material than directory layouts.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.