From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kms in defconfig
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:45:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F65FA2.4010603@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <21d7e9970904270156v54a6483fs20d5b31c97a1d482@mail.gmail.com>
Hello,
Dave Airlie wrote:
> My main worry is distro configs going forward, where they pull
> something from defconfig, granted I've no idea if that'll happen,
> maybe distro kernel maintainers are smarter than I give them credit
> for :-)
We're probably as dumb as or even dumber than you give credit for but
we do have testing cycles in place to compensate for it, so I don't
think distros-might-screw-up needs to be a concern when deciding what
gets turned on in defconfig. :-)
I think defconfig should enable options such that it shows where
upstream kernel is headed, so FWIW +1 for KMS from me.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 1:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-27 8:21 kms in defconfig Dave Airlie
2009-04-27 8:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-27 8:56 ` Dave Airlie
2009-04-28 1:45 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2009-04-28 1:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-28 6:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-28 16:54 ` david
2009-04-28 17:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-28 17:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-28 17:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-28 19:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-28 21:23 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-04-28 17:23 ` david
2009-04-28 17:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-28 21:43 ` Florian Mickler
2009-04-28 21:50 ` david
2009-04-28 23:10 ` Florian Mickler
2009-04-28 23:29 ` david
2009-04-29 6:55 ` Giacomo Catenazzi
2009-04-29 5:36 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-29 5:59 ` Dave Airlie
2009-04-27 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-28 1:54 ` Dave Airlie
2009-04-28 7:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2009-04-28 17:04 ` Jesse Barnes
2009-04-28 23:42 ` Dave Airlie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49F65FA2.4010603@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.