From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Zhai, Edwin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] [Xend] Fix HVM PCI hot removal failure Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:33:40 +0800 Message-ID: <49F6CD74.3020008@intel.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xensource.com To: Keir Fraser Cc: Yuji Shimada , Xen Developers , Ian Jackson , "Zhai, Edwin" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Keir Fraser wrote: > On 28/04/2009 09:18, "Zhai, Edwin" wrote: > > > Sorry, I neglected this patch:( > > > > Do we have plan to improve the coexistence of qemu and xen? > > You know, sometimes 2 coupled repos make debug difficult given that qemu > > has more and more features(hotplug, power). How about adding a bridge > > between qemu's git and xen's hg, so that all the changes can be tracked > > easily. > > How might that work? Just my thoughts, not sure if it's workable:) * Ian maintains his git repo background, other developers just see a hg repo including qemu * Keep sync between git qemu and hg qemu: 1. Any patches including qemu changes go into git repo automatically. Can scripts do this? 2. When rebase qemu, Ian generate a big patch against previous git repo, then push it back to hg repo. I have no idea of current qemu rebase process, not sure if any extra work load needed. Ian can comment. Thanks, > > -- Keir > > -- best rgds, edwin