Re: [PATCH] [Xend] Fix HVM PCI hot removal failure

[Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>]

Zhai, Edwin wrote:

> 
> Keir Fraser wrote:
>>  On 28/04/2009 09:18, "Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, I neglected this patch:(
>>>
>>> Do we have plan to improve the coexistence of qemu and xen?
>>> You know, sometimes 2 coupled repos make debug difficult given that qemu
>>> has more and more features(hotplug, power). How about adding a bridge
>>> between qemu's git and xen's hg, so that all the changes can be tracked
>>> easily.
>>  How might that work?
> 
> Just my thoughts, not sure if it's workable:)
> * Ian maintains his git repo background, other developers just see a
>   hg repo including qemu
> * Keep sync between git qemu and hg qemu:
>   1. Any patches including qemu changes go into git repo
> automatically. Can scripts do this?
>   2. When rebase qemu, Ian generate a big patch against previous git
> repo, then push it back to hg repo.
> 
> I have no idea of current qemu rebase process, not sure if any extra
> work load needed. Ian can comment.
> 

A two way synchronization between the qemu hg mirror and the qemu git
repo would mean trouble.

Maybe we could find a way to mirror the qemu git repo inside the
xen-unstable hg repo, but it would still just a mirror.