From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LyrQn-0004ED-NI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:49:21 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LyrQj-0004D8-RO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:49:21 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40096 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LyrQj-0004D1-KC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:49:17 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.141]:47457) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LyrQj-0007GH-8J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:49:17 -0400 Received: from d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (d01relay04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.236]) by e1.ny.us.ibm.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n3SHjkeQ016718 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:45:46 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (d01av04.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.64]) by d01relay04.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n3SHnFlU039674 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:49:15 -0400 Received: from d01av04.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av04.pok.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n3SHnFLS005864 for ; Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:49:15 -0400 Message-ID: <49F74199.5030503@us.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:49:13 -0500 From: Anthony Liguori MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 9/9] Introduce VLANClientState::cleanup() References: <1239812969-8320-2-git-send-email-markmc@redhat.com> <200904281817.56416.paul@codesourcery.com> <49F73C15.7090504@us.ibm.com> <200904281846.19363.paul@codesourcery.com> In-Reply-To: <200904281846.19363.paul@codesourcery.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paul Brook Cc: Mark McLoughlin , Marcelo Tosatti , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Markus Armbruster Paul Brook wrote: > Hmm, in that case I don't understand your distinction between frontend and > backend. > In the case of networking, they don't have to be distinct because all you need to do is have two "front-ends" and flip the TX/RX queues. Although even in this case, someone has to own the MAC address so it's not purely symmetric. In the general case, that isn't always true for devices. Consider block devices, for instance. -- Regards, Anthony Liguori