From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Eric Leblond <eric@inl.fr>
Cc: kaber@trash.net, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] make thread-safe iface resolution in libnfnetlink
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 02:01:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F798EB.3050203@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1240955127-13723-1-git-send-email-eric@inl.fr>
Eric Leblond wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've encountered some problems with libnfnetlink iface resolution on a
> system where some interfaces are getting up and down: NuFW which uses
> this feature has crashed during a down/up of an interfaces. One of
> the reason seems that nufw uses one thread is used for iface related
> event treatment and another thread is doing iface name resolution.
>
> As the hash can be modified or read without any lock, I think the
> problem can be linked with this issue. I thus propose a patch that
> modifies the iface resolution subsystem to make it thread-safe.
Better do the locking in your application. You can define the lock in
NuFW and protect the calls to libnfnetlink's interface API. Adding this
locking to a library does not seem to me like the right thing, see that
other non-threaded clients will have to live with the overhead of this
lock that is completely useless for them. Of course, we can document
that the interface API is not thread-safe.
I'm rewriting libnfnetlink from scratch (libnfnetlink2?) considering
this and other existing issues. I think that we can have better a
thread-safe interface API soon. Stay tuned.
--
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-29 0:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-28 21:45 [RFC] make thread-safe iface resolution in libnfnetlink Eric Leblond
2009-04-28 21:45 ` [PATCH] iftable: make library thread-safe Eric Leblond
2009-04-29 0:01 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2009-05-05 13:23 ` [RFC] make thread-safe iface resolution in libnfnetlink Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49F798EB.3050203@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=eric@inl.fr \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.