From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: origin tree build warnings
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:38:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F87490.5090401@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090429005210.3dd9166e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:44:36 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
>> Hi Tyler,
>>
>> Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) generated these warnings:
>>
>> fs/ecryptfs/inode.c: In function 'ecryptfs_readlink':
>> fs/ecryptfs/inode.c:670: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type 'size_t'
>> fs/ecryptfs/inode.c:693: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
>>
>> Caused by commit 3a6b42cadc112b01daf0525e5fcd90bb333a5bb3 ("eCryptfs:
>> Larger buffer for encrypted symlink targets").
>
> yup, Randy sent a fix for this today.
>
> I merged that patch and put it into my "to be merged into 2.6.30 via
> the ecryptfs tree" pile.
>
> Tyler, if you can't be bothered setting up a git pull for a one-liner
> then feel free to tell me to merge it.
>
> If you don't do that then I tend to end up sitting on the patch for
> rather a while, sending it at the tree maintainer once every couple of
> weeks. Sometimes I end up sitting on them after the major kernel
> release, after having sent them to the maintainer several times, which
> is all very sad. Sometimes I'll get bored of sending them at the
> maintainer and I'll just merge them anyway, depending upon how frisky
> I'm feeling.
Hi Andrew - I see another warning in Stephen's email that should be
addressed, too. I'll fix that and set up a git pull containing both
fixes a little later today.
Tyler
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-29 15:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-29 4:44 linux-next: origin tree build warnings Stephen Rothwell
2009-04-29 7:52 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-29 15:38 ` Tyler Hicks [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-01-01 0:42 Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-01 0:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-01 1:22 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-01 1:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-01 1:50 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-01-02 9:32 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2010-01-04 13:51 ` Samuel Ortiz
2008-12-29 0:35 Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 4:01 ` David Miller
2008-12-29 4:17 ` Stephen Rothwell
2008-12-29 4:21 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49F87490.5090401@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.