All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] orphan cleanup
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:22:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F9FA82.3020201@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090430185346.GE2762@mail.oracle.com>

Joel Becker wrote:
> Srini,
> 	Ok, you can go ahead and cook up the background orphan cleaner.
> Now, we can do this in a workqueue, a thread, or a timer.  I don't see
> why a timer doesn't work.  When the timer fires, you do this:
>
> 1. Take EX on a new orphan_scan lock.
> 2. check the LVB for the last scan time.  If it's less than the scan
>    timeout, reset the timer for (timeout - last scan), drop the EX, and
>    exit.

We should add a random value to the timeout. Else the master will end up
"winning" the task every time.

> 3. Call ocfs2_queue_recovery_completion() for all slots with NULL, NULL,
>    NULL on the non-orphan-dir arguments.  This sets up the orphan
>    recovery.
> 4. Update the LVB with the current scan time.
> 5. Drop the EX to an NL.
> 6. Reset the timer for the scan timeout.
>
> 	Points about this scheme:
>
> - Doesn't need a process.
> - Don't need to change the locking protocol version, as older versions
>   just ignore this problem.
> - Ensures only one node runs the scan each timeout period.
> - Uses our existing orphan recovery code unchanged.
> - We don't need to keep a PR on the orphan scan lock.  It's just extra
>   network traffic and downconvert processing we don't care about.
>   Better to wake up once when our timeout fires than to wake up every
>   time another node goes to make a scan.
> - I realize that I've updated the scan time at the queue of the scan,
>   not at the completion.  It doesn't really make much of a difference
>   with many-minute scan periods, and it is a lot simpler than trying to
>   add code to wait on all the orphans.
>
> Joel

Looks good.

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-30 19:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-30 18:53 [Ocfs2-devel] orphan cleanup Joel Becker
2009-04-30 19:22 ` Sunil Mushran [this message]
2009-04-30 22:43   ` Srinivas Eeda
2009-04-30 22:57     ` Joel Becker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49F9FA82.3020201@oracle.com \
    --to=sunil.mushran@oracle.com \
    --cc=ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.