All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
	Andy Adamson <andros@umich.edu>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: nfs tree build warning
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 15:19:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49FAE8B4.6020500@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1241148155.15476.128.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>

On May. 01, 2009, 6:22 +0300, Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 13:15 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Trond,
>>
>> Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) produced this warning:
>>
>> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c: In function 'nfs4_proc_exchange_id':
>> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c:4279: warning: the frame size of 2288 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes
>>
>> Introduced by commit 63a93b4af49220c74757beb17b5617b72d912b6b ("nfs41:
>> exchange_id operation").  This commit has been around for a while.
> 
> Benny, Andy,
> 
> Why are we preallocating 1k buffers on the stack for these things?
> That's an insane amount of free space...
> 
> If this is truly a realistic value (which I sincerely doubt), then the
> right thing to do is to preallocate a page in which to store them.
> Putting 1k arrays on the stack is just _wrong_.
> 
> Trond
> 

Ouch, struct nfs41_exchange_id_res contains
	struct server_owner		server_owner;
	struct server_scope		server_scope;
each embedding a char [NFS4_OPAQUE_LIMIT] array
which is 1K in length.
Not only we should have preallocated these arrays dynamically,
we actually throw them away.
Therefore I suggest that until they are put to use
we should just skip their xdr decoding, like we do
for the implementation ID.

Benny

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-01 12:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-01  3:15 linux-next: nfs tree build warning Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-01  3:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-05-01 12:19   ` Benny Halevy [this message]
2009-05-01 14:56     ` William A. (Andy) Adamson
2009-05-01 20:14       ` [PATCH] nfs41: get rid of unused struct nfs41_exchange_id_res members Benny Halevy
2009-05-05 19:34         ` Trond Myklebust
2009-05-05 19:39           ` Trond Myklebust
2009-05-05 19:41             ` Trond Myklebust
2009-05-05 20:28               ` Benny Halevy
2009-05-05 20:35                 ` Benny Halevy
2009-05-05 22:12                   ` Trond Myklebust
2009-05-05 22:15                     ` Benny Halevy
2009-05-05 22:39                       ` Trond Myklebust
2009-05-07 15:56                         ` Benny Halevy
2009-05-07 16:00                           ` [PATCH 1/6] nfs41: Ignoring impid in decode_exchange_id is missing a READ_BUF Benny Halevy
2009-05-07 16:00                           ` [PATCH 2/6] nfs41: fix Xcode_exchange_id's xdr Xcoding pointer type Benny Halevy
2009-05-07 16:00                           ` [PATCH 3/6] nfs41: get rid of unused struct nfs41_exchange_id_res members Benny Halevy
2009-05-07 16:00                           ` [PATCH 4/6] nfs41: fix Xcode_create_session's xdr Xcoding pointer type Benny Halevy
2009-05-07 16:00                           ` [PATCH 5/6] nfs41: refactor decoding of channel attributes Benny Halevy
2009-05-07 16:01                           ` [PATCH 6/6] nfs41: fix encode_destroy_session's xdr Xcoding pointer type Benny Halevy
2009-05-05 22:43                       ` [pnfs] [PATCH] nfs41: get rid of unused struct nfs41_exchange_id_res members J. Bruce Fields
2009-06-09  9:13 ` linux-next: nfs tree build warning Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-06-19  0:50 Stephen Rothwell
2009-06-19  1:09 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-06-19  2:00   ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-10  0:58 Stephen Rothwell
2009-08-10 12:51 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-12-31  0:01 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49FAE8B4.6020500@panasas.com \
    --to=bhalevy@panasas.com \
    --cc=andros@umich.edu \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.