Re: Using archaic I2C with OF

[Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>]

Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> Post this on the i2c list. Jean has made an effort to convert all
>> drivers. He must have missed that one.
> 
> What Jean did was converting all drivers who used the legacy i2c-binding to use
> the new binding which is a lot better suited to the driver model. The above
> mentioned driver already uses the new binding.
> 
> The problem coming up here is another issue and also long standing and not yet
> solved. There are drivers which require platform_data with function pointers.
> You cannot encode function pointers to the device tree.
> 
> One solution is to create a custom driver for your board with the needed
> specific function and create a platform device from there. Sometimes it
> works to add a bit more info to the device tree (e.g. some gpios) and
> parse it via an of_wrapper around the platform driver.

Pretty much as I expected.

Are there examples of how to do this?  In particular how to
correlate a GPIO (with interrupt) to another (I2C) device?

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------