From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from [216.145.245.198] (helo=mx02.dls.net) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M0c1X-0000hr-Ih for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 15:46:31 +0200 Received: from [209.242.7.139] (helo=[192.168.231.111]) by mx02.dls.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M0bw1-0008FL-G1 for openembedded-devel@openembedded.org; Sun, 03 May 2009 08:40:49 -0500 Message-ID: <49FD9EEA.4030608@dls.net> Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 08:40:58 -0500 From: "Mike (mwester)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.21) Gecko/20090302 Thunderbird/2.0.0.21 Mnenhy/0.7.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org References: <49FD9A75.3000609@balister.org> In-Reply-To: <49FD9A75.3000609@balister.org> Subject: Re: [RFC]: Remove #####...##### lines X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 13:46:31 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Philip Balister wrote: > Leon Woestenberg wrote: >> ############################################################################# >> >> #I am a bit annoyed by the hash lines in some of the files >> ############################################################################# >> >> # They distract me from the real content of the files. >> ############################################################################# >> >> RFC_REMOVE_HASHLINES ?= 1 > > Although this might start a coding style war, I also find them distracting. Hehe! Let's replace them with prettier formats: #=#=#=#==#=#=#==#=#=#==#=#=#==#=#=#==#=#=#==#=#=#==#=#=#==#=#=#==#=#=# # # I prefer this style. For Major Section headers, anyway. # #=#=#=#==#=#=#==#=#=#==#=#=#==#=#=#==#=#=#==#=#=#==#=#=#==#=#=#==#=#=# #--------------------------------------------------------------------- # # And of course, this style is alway popular for Minor Section headers. # #--------------------------------------------------------------------- Consider the coding style war begun... Seriously, I'd prefer we don't worry too much about the comment styles. Yes, some of the structures annoy me, and I would organize some of the conf files differently, and some files have more blank lines than I would like, and others need some carefully-place blank lines in my opinion, and while we're discussing this, I think the style rules that PR = "r0" should never appear in a recipe is baloney; I feel very strongly that should appear in all recipes.... this could become quite the can of worms, I think. :-) RFC_REMOVE_HASHLINES--; Or, rfcRemoveHashlines-- if camelCase is your preferred style... :-) Mike (mwester) Oops - or should that be: ~Mike (mwester) ;-D