From: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc: Tim Abbott <tabbott@MIT.EDU>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Anders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu>, Waseem Daher <wdaher@mit.edu>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>,
Jeff Arnold <jbarnold@mit.edu>, Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>,
linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] parisc: use new macros for .data.init_task.
Date: Sun, 03 May 2009 21:37:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49FDF282.7010207@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090502221006.GA4309@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 07:13:37AM +0200, Helge Deller wrote:
>> Tim Abbott wrote:
>>> .data.init_task should not need a separate output section; this change
>>> moves it into the .data section.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@mit.edu>
>>> Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>
>>> Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
>>> Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
>>
>> I think this patch is wrong, although it is theoretically correct.
>>
>> IIRC, gcc on hppa is not able to provide an alignment >= 8k, which is
>> why we have done the 16k alignment inside the linker script.
>> So, I think this change will prevent the parisc kernel to boot up.
>> Needs testing.
>
> The patch does not do much...
>
>> Helge
>>
>>> ---
>>> arch/parisc/kernel/init_task.c | 2 +-
>>> arch/parisc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 10 ++--------
>>> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/init_task.c b/arch/parisc/kernel/init_task.c
>>> index 1e25a45..8ee17ea 100644
>>> --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/init_task.c
>>> +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/init_task.c
>>> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(init_mm);
>>> * "init_task" linker map entry..
>>> */
>>> union thread_union init_thread_union
>>> - __attribute__((aligned(128))) __attribute__((__section__(".data.init_task"))) =
>>> + __attribute__((aligned(128))) __init_task_data =
>>> { INIT_THREAD_INFO(init_task) };
> This is a simple replacement with a nicer way to say "this belongs to
> the .data.init_task section - no functional difference.
>
>
>>>
>>> #if PT_NLEVELS == 3
>>> diff --git a/arch/parisc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/parisc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>>> index b5936c9..c8a528d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/parisc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>>> +++ b/arch/parisc/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>>> @@ -103,6 +103,8 @@ SECTIONS
>>> . = ALIGN(L1_CACHE_BYTES);
>>> /* Data */
>>> .data : {
>>> + /* assembler code expects init_task to be 16k aligned */
>>> + INIT_TASK_DATA(16384)
>>> NOSAVE_DATA
>>> CACHELINE_ALIGNED_DATA(L1_CACHE_BYTES)
>>> DATA_DATA
>>> @@ -133,14 +135,6 @@ SECTIONS
>>> }
>>> __bss_stop = .;
>>>
>>> -
>>> - /* assembler code expects init_task to be 16k aligned */
>>> - . = ALIGN(16384);
>>> - /* init_task */
>>> - .data.init_task : {
>>> - *(.data.init_task)
>>> - }
>>> -
> This part moves away from a specific output section to including this in the
> .data output section - with the _same_ alignmnet.
> So the only issue here is that we move init_task before NOSAVE_DATA etc.
>
> I do not see why you think this changes alignmnet?
Ugh. Of course you are correct. It doesn't change anything.
Patch is OK for me.
I missed the 16384 in INIT_TASK_DATA(16384).
Thanks,
Helge
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-03 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-30 23:55 [PATCH 0/5] section name cleanup for parisc Tim Abbott
2009-04-30 23:55 ` [PATCH 1/5] parisc: use NOSAVE_DATA macro for .data.nosave section Tim Abbott
2009-04-30 23:55 ` Tim Abbott
2009-04-30 23:55 ` [PATCH 2/5] parisc: use new macro for .data.cacheline_aligned section Tim Abbott
2009-04-30 23:55 ` Tim Abbott
2009-04-30 23:55 ` [PATCH 3/5] parisc: use new macros for .data.init_task Tim Abbott
2009-04-30 23:55 ` Tim Abbott
2009-04-30 23:55 ` [PATCH 4/5] parisc: use new macro for .data.read_mostly section Tim Abbott
2009-04-30 23:55 ` Tim Abbott
2009-04-30 23:55 ` [PATCH 5/5] parisc: convert to new generic read_mostly support Tim Abbott
2009-05-02 5:13 ` [PATCH 3/5] parisc: use new macros for .data.init_task Helge Deller
2009-05-02 14:04 ` John David Anglin
2009-05-02 14:13 ` Kyle McMartin
2009-05-02 16:16 ` Helge Deller
2009-05-02 16:52 ` John David Anglin
2009-05-02 22:10 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-05-03 19:37 ` Helge Deller [this message]
2009-05-02 14:19 ` [PATCH 0/5] section name cleanup for parisc Kyle McMartin
2009-05-02 16:32 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49FDF282.7010207@gmx.de \
--to=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=andersk@mit.edu \
--cc=jbarnold@mit.edu \
--cc=kyle@mcmartin.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=tabbott@MIT.EDU \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
--cc=wdaher@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.