From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oren Laadan Subject: Re: [RFC v14][PATCH 07/54] cr: extend arch_setup_additional_pages() Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 03:25:25 -0400 Message-ID: <49FE9865.4090600@cs.columbia.edu> References: <1240961064-13991-1-git-send-email-orenl@cs.columbia.edu> <1240961064-13991-8-git-send-email-orenl@cs.columbia.edu> <1241190790.29485.168.camel@nimitz> <20090501154220.GA26771@us.ibm.com> <1241193421.29485.188.camel@nimitz> <20090501161813.GA27516@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090501161813.GA27516-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org Errors-To: containers-bounces-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: containers-cunTk1MwBs9QetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org, Alexey Dobriyan , Dave Hansen List-Id: containers.vger.kernel.org Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Dave Hansen (dave-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org): >> On Fri, 2009-05-01 at 10:42 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: >>> Quoting Dave Hansen (dave-23VcF4HTsmIX0ybBhKVfKdBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org): >>>> On Tue, 2009-04-28 at 19:23 -0400, Oren Laadan wrote: >>>>> From: Alexey Dobriyan >>>>> >>>>> Add "start" argument, to request to map vDSO to a specific place, >>>>> and fail the operation if not. >>>>> >>>>> This is useful for restart(2) to ensure that memory layout is restore >>>>> exactly as needed. >>>> This needs to go up at the start of the series. It can get merged >>>> before everything else. >>> It does, but now we are sending Oren mixed signals. >>> >>> I thought we were talking yesterday on irc about Oren doing append-only >>> git tree from now on, and someone else (you? :) was going to do patch >>> integration and sorting and prettifying? >> I was going to just go and start doing these, but I figured I'd have a >> run through the patches first. I probably also shouldn't be doing >> anything to which Oren (or anyone else) has really strong objections. >> So, I'll give everyone a chance to discuss and object before I go >> screwing the patches up. ;) > > True, part of this may be able to go up on its own. In that case > > 1. please put the part of my s390 fix patch which applies to > this patch in > Fixed. > 2. as I asked when Alexey posted this, can we remove the > first argument to arch_setup_additional_pages()? Noone uses > it. I have no objections. Oren.