From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jes Sorensen Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 09:17:58 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/04] qemu-kvm: other archs should maintain memory mapping Message-Id: <49FEB2C6.1050508@sgi.com> List-Id: References: <706158FABBBA044BAD4FE898A02E4BC236A2BC03@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <706158FABBBA044BAD4FE898A02E4BC236A2BC03@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org Avi Kivity wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: >>> This is the one implementing the KVM_WANT_MAPPING change. >>> >> There is in fact a call to drop_mapping() outside any #ifdef (in >> kvm_cpu_register_physical_memory()). I'm confused... maybe we should >> make this code unconditional. Hi Avi, I don't follow this - if you apply my patch 0005-qemu-kvm-arch-mapping.patch this is no longer the case. Cheers, Jes From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jes Sorensen Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 09:17:58 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/04] qemu-kvm: other archs should maintain memory mapping Message-Id: <49FEB2C6.1050508@sgi.com> List-Id: References: <706158FABBBA044BAD4FE898A02E4BC236A2BC03@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> <49F6CED2.1060202@redhat.com> <49F86CED.3010101@sgi.com> <49FEAE3A.2070001@redhat.com> <49FEAE6D.9040708@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <49FEAE6D.9040708@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Avi Kivity Cc: "Zhang, Xiantao" , Hollis Blanchard , "kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , kvm-devel , kvm-ppc Avi Kivity wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: >>> This is the one implementing the KVM_WANT_MAPPING change. >>> >> There is in fact a call to drop_mapping() outside any #ifdef (in >> kvm_cpu_register_physical_memory()). I'm confused... maybe we should >> make this code unconditional. Hi Avi, I don't follow this - if you apply my patch 0005-qemu-kvm-arch-mapping.patch this is no longer the case. Cheers, Jes From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jes Sorensen Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/04] qemu-kvm: other archs should maintain memory mapping also. Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 11:17:58 +0200 Message-ID: <49FEB2C6.1050508@sgi.com> References: <706158FABBBA044BAD4FE898A02E4BC236A2BC03@pdsmsx503.ccr.corp.intel.com> <49F6CED2.1060202@redhat.com> <49F86CED.3010101@sgi.com> <49FEAE3A.2070001@redhat.com> <49FEAE6D.9040708@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Zhang, Xiantao" , Hollis Blanchard , "kvm-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , kvm-devel , kvm-ppc To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from relay2.sgi.com ([192.48.179.30]:32906 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751238AbZEDJSE (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 May 2009 05:18:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <49FEAE6D.9040708@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Avi Kivity wrote: > Avi Kivity wrote: >>> This is the one implementing the KVM_WANT_MAPPING change. >>> >> There is in fact a call to drop_mapping() outside any #ifdef (in >> kvm_cpu_register_physical_memory()). I'm confused... maybe we should >> make this code unconditional. Hi Avi, I don't follow this - if you apply my patch 0005-qemu-kvm-arch-mapping.patch this is no longer the case. Cheers, Jes