All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/8] virtio: add guest MSI-X support
Date: Mon, 04 May 2009 14:57:36 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49FED830.2090008@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090504115450.GB30001@redhat.com>

Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 12:21:28PM +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>   
>> Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>     
>>>>> So what I see is transports providing something like:
>>>>>
>>>>> struct virtio_interrupt_mapping {
>>>>> 	int virtqueue;
>>>>> 	int interrupt;
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> map_vqs_to_interrupt(dev, struct virtio_interrupt_mapping *, int nvirtqueues);
>>>>> unmap_vqs(dev);
>>>>>         
>>>>>           
>>>> Isn't that the same thing?  Please explain the flow.
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> So to map vq 0 to vector 0, vq 1 to vector 1 and vq 2 to vector 2 the driver would do:
>>>
>>> struct virtio_interrupt_mapping mapping[3] = { {0, 0}, {1, 1}, {2, 2} };
>>> vec = map_vqs_to_interrupt(dev, mapping, 3);
>>> if (vec) {
>>>   error handling
>>> }
>>>
>>> and then find_vq as usual.
>>>   
>>>       
>> Yes, that works.
>>
>> Given that pci_enable_msix() can fail, we can put the retry loop in  
>> virtio-pci, and instead of a static mapping, supply a dynamic mapping:
>>
>>    static void get_vq_interrupt(..., int nr_interrupts, int vq)
>>    {
>>        /* reserve interrupt 0 to config changes; round-robin vqs to  
>> interrupts */
>>        return 1 + (vq % (nr_interrupts - 1));
>>    }
>>
>>    driver_init()
>>    {
>>        map_vqs_to_interrupt(dev, get_vq_interrupt);
>>    }
>>
>> map_vqs_to_interrupts() would call get_vq_interrupt() for each vq,  
>> assuming the maximum nr_interrupts, and retry with smaller nr_interrupts  
>> on failure.
>>     
>
> Since guest drivers are going to do round-robin most of the time, I
> think the right thing to do is to make the API simple, along the lines
> proposed by Rusty, and make the guest/host ABI rich enough to support
> arbitrary mapping, along the lines proposed by you. We can always change
> the API, ABI is harder.
>   

We can provide the round-robin mapper as a helper, so driver code 
doesn't need to implement any callback if they're satisfied with the 
default.

-- 
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.


  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-04 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-27 12:31 [PATCH RFC 0/8] virtio: add guest MSI-X support Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 14:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-04-27 14:32   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 15:37     ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-04-27 17:17       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 17:17       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 15:37     ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-04-27 14:32   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 15:06   ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-27 15:39     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 16:59       ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-04-27 17:19         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 17:19         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 16:59       ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-04-28  6:47       ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-28 17:41         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-28 17:41         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-28 17:51           ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-28 17:51           ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-28 18:02             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-28 19:56               ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-28 21:01                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-28 19:56               ` Anthony Liguori
2009-05-04  9:21               ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-04  9:21               ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-04 11:54                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-05-04 11:57                   ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-05-04 11:57                   ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-04 11:54                 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-28 18:02             ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-28  6:47       ` Avi Kivity
2009-04-27 15:39     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 14:00 ` Christian Borntraeger
2009-04-27 14:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-27 14:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-04-27 17:42   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2009-04-27 17:42   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-04-27 12:31 Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49FED830.2090008@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.