Re: Tests in Cygwin

[Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@viscovery.net>]

Don Slutz schrieb:
> So which should we go with? foo2() which does the original way or foof()
> which allows you to use ',' and '+', and spaces?

I'd say take Junio's original proposal (that separates with spaces), but use

     for prerequisite in $*      # split args at spaces

(including the comment!) instead of merely

     for prerequisite

I can certainly live with the quoting at the call sites of
test_expect_success that is needed in the few cases where there is more
than one prerequisite.

-- Hannes