From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Woithe <jwoithe@physics.adelaide.edu.au>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2.9.29.2: ide-tape: panic when probing device at boot
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 09:58:10 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0626A2.4060202@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200905091757.49697.bzolnier@gmail.com>
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> [ cc:ing linux-ide and knowledgeable people ]
>
> Borislav/Tejun:
>
> Is the 2.6.29 problem the same thing that was fixed recently?
>
> Should I just push commit 1e75540ec5202cae63cd238c86bd880e3d496546
> ("ide-tape: remove back-to-back REQUEST_SENSE detection") to Linus
> or there is more needed to bring ide-tape to the world of living?
The oops will probably fixed the above commit. I don't have much idea
about the DMA problem on 2.6.24 tho. But even with the above commit
fixed, I doubt it would work. The buffer allocation code is broken
and reliably triggered OOM on my test machine. While trying to locate
the bug, I realized the complex code didn't do much good to begin with
and just stripped it down, so I didn't actually tracked down the
actual bug && the patch to simplify buffer management is way too large
for 2.6.29, so unless someone is willing to hunt down the bug just for
2.6.29, we're kind of stuck. :-(
Thanks.
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-10 0:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-08 7:00 2.9.29.2: ide-tape: panic when probing device at boot Jonathan Woithe
2009-05-09 15:57 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2009-05-09 16:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-10 0:59 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-10 0:59 ` Tejun Heo
2010-01-04 1:15 ` Jonathan Woithe
2010-01-04 1:15 ` Jonathan Woithe
2010-01-04 5:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-01-05 5:38 ` Jonathan Woithe
2010-01-05 5:38 ` Jonathan Woithe
2010-03-12 1:31 ` Jonathan Woithe
2010-03-12 1:31 ` Jonathan Woithe
2010-01-04 5:52 ` Robert Hancock
2009-05-18 5:32 ` Jonathan Woithe
2009-05-18 5:32 ` Jonathan Woithe
2009-05-18 6:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-18 13:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2009-05-10 0:58 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A0626A2.4060202@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=bzolnier@gmail.com \
--cc=jwoithe@physics.adelaide.edu.au \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=petkovbb@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.