All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: khc@pm.waw.pl, netdev@vger.kernel.org, satoru.satoh@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: reduce number of reference taken on sk_refcnt
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 12:45:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A06B064.9080801@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A0685A0.8020002@cosmosbay.com>

Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet a écrit :
>> David Miller a écrit :
>>> From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>>> Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 13:34:54 -0700 (PDT)
>>>
>>>> Consider the case where we always send some message on CPU A and
>>>> then process the ACK on CPU B.  We'll always be cancelling the
>>>> timer on a foreign cpu.
>>> I should also mention that TCP has a peculiar optimization of timers
>>> that is likely being thwarted by your workload.  It never deletes
>>> timers under normal operation, it simply lets them still expire
>>> and the handler notices that there is "nothing to do" and returns.
>> Yes, you refer to INET_CSK_CLEAR_TIMERS condition, never set.
>>
>>> But when the connection does shut down, we have to purge all of
>>> these timers.
>>>
>>> That could be another part of why you see timers in your profile.
>>>
>>>
>> Well, in my workload they should never expire, since application exchange
>> enough data on both direction, and they are no losses (Gigabit LAN context)
>>
>> On machine acting as a server (the one I am focusing to, of course),
>> each incoming frame :
>>
>> - Contains ACK for the previous sent frame
>> - Contains data provided by the client.
>> - Starts a timer for delayed ACK
>>
>> Then server applications reacts and sends a new payload, and TCP stack
>> - Sends a frame including ACK for previous received frame
>> - Contains data provided by server application
>> - Starts a timer for retransmiting this frame if no ACK is received later.
>>
>> So yes, each incoming and each outgoing frame is going to call mod_timer()
>>
>> Problem is that incoming process is done by CPU 0 (the one that is dedicated
>> to NAPI processing because of stress situation, cpu 100% in softirq land),
>> and outgoing processing done by other cpus in the machine.
>>
>> offsetof(struct inet_connection_sock, icsk_retransmit_timer)=0x208
>> offsetof(struct inet_connection_sock, icsk_delack_timer)=0x238
>>
>> So there are cache line ping-pongs, but oprofile seems to point
>> to a spinlock contention in lock_timer_base(), I dont know why...
>> shouldnt (in my workload) delack_timer all belongs to cpu 0, and 
>> retransmit_timers to other cpus ? 
>>
>> Or is mod_timer never migrates an already established timer ?
>>
>> That would explain the lock contention on timer_base, we should
>> take care of it if possible.
>>
> 
> ftrace is my friend :)
> 
> Problem is the application, when doing it recv() call
> is calling tcp_send_delayed_ack() too.
> 
> So yes, cpus are fighting on icsk_delack_timer and their
> timer_base pretty hard.
> 
> 

Changing tcp_prequeue to use same delack timer than tcp_send_delayed_ack()
helps a lot, but I dont know if its correct or not.

It was already changed recently in commit 0c266898b42fe4e4e2f9edfc9d3474c10f93aa6a

Author: Satoru SATOH <satoru.satoh@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon May 4 11:11:01 2009 -0700

    tcp: Fix tcp_prequeue() to get correct rto_min value

    tcp_prequeue() refers to the constant value (TCP_RTO_MIN) regardless of
    the actual value might be tuned. The following patches fix this and make
    tcp_prequeue get the actual value returns from tcp_rto_min().

but as reader will reset timeout to an even smaller value, I wonder if
we should not select this smaller value sooner, to avoid a mod_timer ping/pong

TCP_RTO_MIN (200 ms) was too big, but (3 * tcp_rto_min(sk)) / 4 might
be too big too...

New profile data of cpu0 (no more timer stuff, and improved bandwidth
by more than 10 %). back to normal device driver load and scheduler (wakeups)

104452   104452        13.3363  13.3363    bnx2_poll_work
56103    160555         7.1631  20.4994    __wake_up
38650    199205         4.9348  25.4342    task_rq_lock
37947    237152         4.8450  30.2792    __slab_alloc
37229    274381         4.7533  35.0326    tcp_v4_rcv
34781    309162         4.4408  39.4734    __alloc_skb
27977    337139         3.5721  43.0454    skb_release_data
26516    363655         3.3855  46.4309    ip_rcv
26399    390054         3.3706  49.8015    resched_task
26059    416113         3.3272  53.1287    __inet_lookup_established
25518    441631         3.2581  56.3868    sock_wfree
23515    465146         3.0024  59.3892    ip_route_input
19811    484957         2.5294  61.9186    select_task_rq_fair
16901    501858         2.1579  64.0765    __kfree_skb
16466    518324         2.1024  66.1788    __enqueue_entity
16008    534332         2.0439  68.2227    sched_clock_cpu
15486    549818         1.9772  70.2000    try_to_wake_up
14641    564459         1.8693  72.0693    update_curr
13725    578184         1.7524  73.8217    enqueue_task_fair
13304    591488         1.6986  75.5203    __kmalloc_track_caller
13190    604678         1.6841  77.2044    kmem_cache_alloc
12016    616694         1.5342  78.7386    __tcp_prequeue
10989    627683         1.4031  80.1416    __wake_up_common
10623    638306         1.3563  81.4980    netif_receive_skb
10004    648310         1.2773  82.7753    place_entity


Patch follows for RFC only (not Signed-of...), and based on net-next-2.6 

diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index 19f4150..906f597 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -922,10 +922,13 @@ static inline int tcp_prequeue(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	} else if (skb_queue_len(&tp->ucopy.prequeue) == 1) {
 		wake_up_interruptible_poll(sk->sk_sleep,
 					   POLLIN | POLLRDNORM | POLLRDBAND);
-		if (!inet_csk_ack_scheduled(sk))
+		if (!inet_csk_ack_scheduled(sk)) {
+			unsigned int delay = (3 * tcp_rto_min(sk)) / 4;
+
+			delay = min(inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ack.ato, delay);
 			inet_csk_reset_xmit_timer(sk, ICSK_TIME_DACK,
-						  (3 * tcp_rto_min(sk)) / 4,
-						  TCP_RTO_MAX);
+						  delay, TCP_RTO_MAX);
+		}
 	}
 	return 1;
 }


  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-10 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-08 12:32 NAPI and TX Krzysztof Halasa
2009-05-08 14:24 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-05-08 15:12 ` [PATCH] net: reduce number of reference taken on sk_refcnt Eric Dumazet
2009-05-08 21:48   ` David Miller
2009-05-09 12:13     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-09 20:34       ` David Miller
2009-05-09 20:40         ` David Miller
2009-05-10  7:09           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-10  7:43             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-10 10:45               ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-05-19  4:58                 ` David Miller
2009-05-21  9:07                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-09 20:36       ` David Miller
2009-05-08 21:44 ` NAPI and TX David Miller
2009-05-09 12:27   ` Krzysztof Halasa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A06B064.9080801@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=satoru.satoh@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.