From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Message-ID: <4A08939D.5050203@am.sony.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:07:41 -0700 From: Geoff Levand MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roel Kluin Subject: Re: [PATCH] ps3: remove driver_data direct access of struct device References: <4A087DB9.50305@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A087DB9.50305@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Cc: Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org, lkml List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Roel, On 05/11/2009 12:34 PM, Roel Kluin wrote: > To avoid direct access to the driver_data pointer in struct device, the > functions dev_get_drvdata() and dev_set_drvdata() should be used. > > Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin > --- > Please review. especially note that I removed a > kfree(dev->sbd.core.driver_data); > Is that correct? Comment below. > arch/powerpc/include/asm/ps3.h | 4 ++-- > drivers/char/ps3flash.c | 11 +++++------ > drivers/scsi/ps3rom.c | 10 +++++----- > drivers/video/ps3fb.c | 6 +++--- > 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ps3.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ps3.h > index cdb6fd8..a55717e 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ps3.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/ps3.h > @@ -421,12 +421,12 @@ static inline struct ps3_system_bus_driver * > static inline void ps3_system_bus_set_driver_data( > struct ps3_system_bus_device *dev, void *data) > { > - dev->core.driver_data = data; > + dev_set_drvdata(&dev->core, data); > } > static inline void *ps3_system_bus_get_driver_data( > struct ps3_system_bus_device *dev) > { > - return dev->core.driver_data; > + return dev_get_drvdata(&dev->core); > } > > /* These two need global scope for get_dma_ops(). */ > diff --git a/drivers/char/ps3flash.c b/drivers/char/ps3flash.c > index afbe456..6083032 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/ps3flash.c > +++ b/drivers/char/ps3flash.c > @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static ssize_t ps3flash_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count, > loff_t *pos) > { > struct ps3_storage_device *dev = ps3flash_dev; > - struct ps3flash_private *priv = dev->sbd.core.driver_data; > + struct ps3flash_private *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->sbd.core); These should all be using ps3_system_bus_get_driver_data() and ps3_system_bus_set_driver_data(): struct ps3flash_private *priv = ps3_system_bus_get_driver_data(&dev->sbd) > @@ -404,8 +404,7 @@ static int ps3flash_remove(struct ps3_system_bus_device *_dev) > > misc_deregister(&ps3flash_misc); > ps3stor_teardown(dev); > - kfree(dev->sbd.core.driver_data); > - dev->sbd.core.driver_data = NULL; > + dev_set_drvdata(&dev->sbd.core, NULL); It seems that will result in a memory leak. Why did you think the kfree() should be removed? Won't this work? kfree(ps3_system_bus_get_driver_data(&dev->sbd)); ps3_system_bus_set_driver_data(&dev->sbd, NULL); > ps3flash_dev = NULL; > return 0; > } -Geoff