From: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
To: "Christopher J. PeBenito" <cpebenito@tresys.com>
Cc: dwalsh@redhat.com, method@manicmethod.com, russell@coker.com.au,
SE-Linux <selinux@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: daemons and MCS categories
Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 13:07:47 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0A4793.1070800@ak.jp.nec.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A08C0DC.30108@ak.jp.nec.com>
KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>> On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 14:11 +0900, KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>>> Are anyone interested in the daemon process with mcs categories?
>>>
>>> My proposition tries to cover general daemon processes, but my
>>> major concern is apache/httpd performing without any categories.
>>> If we focus on the apache/httpd, we can add the following policy
>>> within the mod_selinux.pp, and it enables to run httpd_t with
>>> mcs categories.
>>>
>>> optional_policy(`
>>> init_ranged_daemon_domain(httpd_t,httpd_exec_t,s0 - mcs_systemhigh)
>>> ')
>>>
>>> The mod_selinux.so is an apache/httpd module which enables to
>>> change its own security context prior to launching contents
>>> handler. We can set up the module to drop all the categories
>>> for unauthorized http clients, and rest of requests to perform
>>> with appropriate categories.
>>>
>>> The above rule will be available only when mod_selinux is installed.
>>> I don't think it gives any impact for existing stuffs.
>> I think we should leave this up to the users. Apache should only be
>> given the set of categories which is the union of all of the categories
>> used by mod_selinux, which can only be determined by the users.
>
> Yes, I also think it is more preferable than (mostly) wired mcs_systemhigh.
> However, the matter is the way to start up httpd with certain categories.
> The run_init invokes all the daemon process with a security context
> configured in /etc/selinux/$POLICYTYPE/contexts/initrc_context, and
> the case when system startup script kicks them also does not care anything.
>
> What is a preferable idea?
>
> Here is one other idea I noticed yesterday.
> 1. The mod_selinux package installs mod_selinux.pp which adds a range_transition
> rule to mcs_systemhigh on httpd_t and httpd_exec_t as I noted above.
> 2. The mod_selinux.so (loadable module for httpd) drops unnecessary categories
> at the ap_run_post_config() hook which gives modules a change to verify
> global configuration.
>
> It is Apache/httpd specific solution, but 99% of my concern will be solved.
I tried to implement the idea, and it seems to me it works correctly.
http://code.google.com/p/sepgsql/source/browse/misc/mod_selinux/mod_selinux.c#123
o /etc/httpd/conf.d/mod_selinux.conf
:
selinuxServerDomain *:s0-s0:c0.c15
:
This global directive specifies a domain/range pair to be performed as.
o /var/log/httpd/error_log
:
[Wed May 13 12:48:32 2009] [notice] SELinux policy enabled; \
httpd running as context system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
:
[Wed May 13 12:48:32 2009] [debug] mod_selinux.c(154): SELinux: \
replace server domain: system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023/*:s0-s0:c0.c15
:
The log message said the apache/httpd was initially started up with
system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023, then mod_selinux dropped
unnecessary categories according to the selinuxServerDomain .
(mod_selinux.pp add a range_transition rule.)
o ps -AZ
[root@saba ~]# ps -AZ | grep httpd
system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c15 2994 ? 00:00:00 httpd
system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c15 2997 ? 00:00:00 httpd
system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c15 2998 ? 00:00:00 httpd
system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c15 2999 ? 00:00:00 httpd
system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c15 3000 ? 00:00:00 httpd
system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c15 3001 ? 00:00:00 httpd
system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c15 3002 ? 00:00:00 httpd
system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c15 3003 ? 00:00:00 httpd
system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c15 3004 ? 00:00:00 httpd
It can assign content handler a category between c0 and c15
based on the http authentication.
I think 80% of the package is ready to push for Fedora Project.
The remaining issue is the following ugly policy:
http://code.google.com/p/sepgsql/source/browse/misc/mod_selinux/mod_selinux.if
If possible, I would like services/apache.if to provide an interface to
assign minimum set of privileges to perform as a part of httpd process.
It enables web-application authors to focus on access controls for
web contents.
Thanks,
> Thanks,
>
>>> KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>>>> The attached patch is a proof-of-concept for the facility to launch
>>>> daemon processes with a certaon mcs ranges.
>>>>
>>>> The selinux-daemon-mcs-run_init.patch add run_init a new option which
>>>> specifies the name of daemon.
>>>>
>>>> # run_init -n httpd /etc/init.d/httpd restart
>>>>
>>>> When -n option is given, run_init lookups under the
>>>> /etc/selinux/<policy type>/contexts/initrc/<daemon>, and replaces the
>>>> range to be assigned on the init script.
>>>>
>>>> [root@saba run_init]# cat /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/initrc/httpd
>>>> s0-s0:c0.c31
>>>> [root@saba run_init]# ./run_init -n httpd /etc/init.d/httpd restart
>>>> Authenticating kaigai.
>>>> Password:
>>>> Stopping httpd: [ OK ]
>>>> Starting httpd: [ OK ]
>>>> [root@saba run_init]# ps -AZ | grep httpd
>>>> system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c31 11303 ? 00:00:00 httpd
>>>> system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c31 11305 ? 00:00:00 httpd
>>>> system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c31 11308 ? 00:00:00 httpd
>>>> system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c31 11309 ? 00:00:00 httpd
>>>> system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0-s0:c0.c31 11310 ? 00:00:00 httpd
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>> The selinux-daemon-mcs-rc-script.patch is a short hack to the system
>>>> init script. It launches the required script with "runcon -l", if
>>>> per-daemon range is configured.
>>>>
>>>> These reworks typicall enable web-application (launched by httpd) to
>>>> perform in a certain restrictive category of MCS.
>>>> Currently, mod_selinux's security policy module assigns "mcssetcats"
>>>> on httpd_t, but it is fundamentally denger and nonsense. :(
>>>>
>>>> So, I would like to see the daemon processes with appropriate categories.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>>>>> KaiGai Kohei wrote:
>>>>>> Sorry for opening the old discussion again.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you don't ML logs in local, please see the archives:
>>>>>> http://marc.info/?t=114825463100001&r=1&w=2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christopher J. PeBenito wrote:
>>>>>>> I agree with James on this, I don't think we want to impose semantics in
>>>>>>> the MCS categories, and that this
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Another possibility is to have the ability to configure which categories are
>>>>>>>> assigned to a daemon via run_init or some similar program. It would not be
>>>>>>>> difficult to read a config file that maps the domain of a daemon to the range
>>>>>>>> that should be granted to it.
>>>>>>> is useful so that if users do want to run a daemon with categories, they
>>>>>>> can.
>>>>>> Is it still unavailable on the current SELinux userspace utilities, isn't it?
>>>>> Shall we start to implement an extention of run_init and others based on
>>>>> the above Russell's idea?
>>>>>
>>>>> Now, I have a plan to store configuration files at:
>>>>> /etc/selinux/${POLICY_TYPE}/contexts/initrc/${DAEMON}
>>>>> or
>>>>> /etc/selinux/${POLICY_TYPE}/contexts/initrc_contexts with format extensions
>>>>>
>>>>> and, add a new option to run_init as:
>>>>> run_init [-n <daemon>] <script> [<args> ...]
>>>>>
>>>>> It intends to see the per-daemon default range, instead of the initrc_contexts.
>>>>>
>>>>> and, add a bit of hacks on the /etc/rc.d/rc script which launches daemon scripts
>>>>> when run-level is changed. (Maybe, it is necessary to launch them via "runcon -l"
>>>>> when the given daemon has its own range.)
>>>>>
>>>>> The last also need to have a discussion in the Fedora developer's list.
>>>>> Dan, do you think it is a hopefull proposition?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>> If we could start the init-scripts via runcon by hand, it seems to me the
>>>>>> daemon processes performs with multi categories.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> | [root@saba ~]# runcon -l s0-s0:c0.c255 /etc/init.d/httpd restart
>>>>>> | Stopping httpd: [ OK ]
>>>>>> | Starting httpd: [ OK ]
>>>>>> | [root@saba ~]# ps -AZ | grep httpd
>>>>>> | unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c255 6458 ? 00:00:00 httpd
>>>>>> | unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c255 6460 ? 00:00:00 httpd
>>>>>> | unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c255 6461 ? 00:00:00 httpd
>>>>>> | unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c255 6462 ? 00:00:00 httpd
>>>>>> | :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But it is unavailable when the system kicks init-script on startup time.
>>>>>> Is there any good idea?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In the recent days, I'm working for an apache module (mod_selinux.so) which
>>>>>> launches web application handler under an individual security context based
>>>>>> on http-authentication.
>>>>>> I'm looking for the way to assign a few dozens of categories on httpd server
>>>>>> processes which are launched at system startup time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>
>
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-13 4:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-21 23:30 daemons and MCS categories Russell Coker
2006-05-25 5:07 ` James Morris
[not found] ` <1148538208.1797.23.camel@papa.intrajp-yokosuka.co.jp>
2006-05-25 7:12 ` Russell Coker
2006-05-29 13:52 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2009-04-20 7:06 ` KaiGai Kohei
2009-04-21 2:05 ` KaiGai Kohei
2009-04-22 8:38 ` KaiGai Kohei
2009-05-11 5:11 ` KaiGai Kohei
2009-05-11 12:37 ` Christopher J. PeBenito
2009-05-12 0:20 ` KaiGai Kohei
2009-05-13 4:07 ` KaiGai Kohei [this message]
2009-05-16 16:05 ` Joe Nall
2009-05-18 8:31 ` KaiGai Kohei
2009-05-18 12:57 ` Joe Nall
2009-05-19 2:51 ` KaiGai Kohei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A0A4793.1070800@ak.jp.nec.com \
--to=kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com \
--cc=cpebenito@tresys.com \
--cc=dwalsh@redhat.com \
--cc=method@manicmethod.com \
--cc=russell@coker.com.au \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.