From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/17][REVIEW] Backport candidates for stable-0.10 Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 18:36:22 -0500 Message-ID: <4A109F76.60505@codemonkey.ws> References: <1242574999-20887-1-git-send-email-aliguori@us.ibm.com> <4A104522.1060309@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anthony Liguori , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Glauber Costa To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mail-gx0-f166.google.com ([209.85.217.166]:39077 "EHLO mail-gx0-f166.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754132AbZEQXgX (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2009 19:36:23 -0400 Received: by gxk10 with SMTP id 10so5689282gxk.13 for ; Sun, 17 May 2009 16:36:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4A104522.1060309@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Avi Kivity wrote: > Anthony Liguori wrote: >> This is a set of patches from master that I think are candidates for the >> stable-0.10 branch. They're all KVM specific. >> >> I tried to be conservative and didn't include any ia64, PPC, or >> passthrough >> fixes. I don't know the state of those subsystems well enough to >> judge whether >> the commits help or not. >> >> To detect set of candidates to consider, I used the following git >> command: >> >> git log ^kvm-stable-start origin/master..kvm >> >> > > 'git log origin/stable-0.10..origin/master' would have given you the > same results ("all commits in master not present in stable"). You need to exclude commits from qemu/master too. git log ^qemu/master origin/stable-0.10..origin/master Gives the same result as what I did. Regards, Anthony Liguori > I commented on some patches; all the rest seem appropriate to me. If > you (and other reviewers) agree, I'll apply these patches. Thanks for > doing this. >