From: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@domain.hid>
To: Philippe Gerum <rpm@xenomai.org>
Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org, Stefan Kisdaroczi <kisda@domain.hid>
Subject: Re: [Xenomai-core] [Xenomai-help] IXXAT-PCI-CAN driver hijacks my pci board
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 12:22:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A13D9F6.30602@domain.hid> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1242812539.31033.12.camel@domain.hid>
Hi Philippe,
Philippe Gerum wrote:
> It looks like this patch is still pending an ack/nak. Wolfgang, any
> comment on this? TIA,
FIFO overrun, sorry.
> On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 21:04 +0200, Stefan Kisdaroczi wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> my pci board has the same pci-interface-chip as the IXXAT-PCI board.
>> The vendor and device id's are identical, but the subsys id is different.
>>
>> The documentation for my board says that it is essential to check all ID values,
>> because vendor and device id are standard values for the pci-interface-chip.
>>
>> dmesg output, there is no IXXAT-PCI-CAN board installed:
>>> RT-Socket-CAN 0.90.2 - (C) 2006 RT-Socket-CAN Development Team
>>> RTCAN SJA1000 driver initialized
>>> PCI: setting IRQ 12 as level-triggered
>>> IXXAT-PCI-CAN 0000:00:11.0: found PCI INT A -> IRQ 12
>>> IXXAT-PCI-CAN: Initializing device 10b5:9050:2503
OK, it finding a variant of the PLX9050, but it will not use the device
because of the following lines after the above printout:
if (sub_sys_id != IXXAT_PCI_SUB_SYS_ID)
return -ENODEV;
But ...
>> The following patch fixed it for me (my own driver loads again).
... obviously it does not probe again.
>> However, i could not check if it still detects the CAN board,
>> as i dont have one.
>>
>> Thanks
>> kisda
>>
>> --- xenomai-2.4.7.orig/ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_ixxat_pci.c
>> +++ xenomai-2.4.7/ksrc/drivers/can/sja1000/rtcan_ixxat_pci.c
>> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
>> #define IXXAT_BASE_PORT_SIZE 0x0400
>>
>> static struct pci_device_id ixxat_pci_tbl[] = {
>> - {IXXAT_PCI_VENDOR_ID, IXXAT_PCI_DEVICE_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, 0},
>> + {IXXAT_PCI_VENDOR_ID, IXXAT_PCI_DEVICE_ID, IXXAT_PCI_VENDOR_ID, IXXAT_PCI_SUB_SYS_ID, 0, 0, 0},
>> { }
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (pci, ixxat_pci_tbl);
I don't have a IXXAT CAN card to check if the sub-vendor id is really
IXXAT_PCI_VENDOR_ID. Does
{IXXAT_PCI_VENDOR_ID, IXXAT_PCI_DEVICE_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, IXXAT_PCI_SUB_SYS_ID, 0, 0, 0},
work as well? A work-around would be to disable the IXXAT-PCI driver in the kernel config.
Wolfgang.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-20 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-05 19:04 [Xenomai-help] IXXAT-PCI-CAN driver hijacks my pci board Stefan Kisdaroczi
2009-05-20 9:42 ` [Xenomai-core] " Philippe Gerum
2009-05-20 10:22 ` Wolfgang Grandegger [this message]
2009-05-20 10:36 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-05-20 10:40 ` Philippe Gerum
2009-05-25 7:36 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-05-20 11:25 ` Stefan Kisdaroczi
2009-05-21 7:39 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-05-22 8:16 ` Sebastian Smolorz
2009-05-22 15:13 ` Wolfgang Grandegger
2009-05-22 15:20 ` Sebastian Smolorz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A13D9F6.30602@domain.hid \
--to=wg@domain.hid \
--cc=kisda@domain.hid \
--cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
--cc=xenomai@xenomai.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.