From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, James Smart <James.Smart@Emulex.Com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@acm.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <Jens.Axboe@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH version 2] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for block/for-2.6.31 tree
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 20:03:09 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A1437CC.1090108@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A1436D8.4050004@panasas.com>
On 05/20/2009 07:59 PM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 05/20/2009 07:43 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
>> If you actually just ask scsi-post-merge-2.6 where this line is, it will
>> tell you:
>>
>> static void blk_finish_request(struct request *req, int error)
>> {
>> BUG_ON(blk_queued_rq(req));
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> if (blk_rq_tagged(req))
>> blk_queue_end_tag(req->q, req);
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>
> This is a new BUG_ON from:
> block: implement and enforce request peek/start/fetch
>
> It looks like there is one more sight of the old usage that
> was not converted.
>
> Tejun?
>
The patch has a comment about that:
* disallowing completion of queued (not started) requests
Do you have a stack trace?
Boaz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-20 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-19 9:18 [PATCH] [SQUASHME] "FC Pass Thru support" fixed for block/for-2.6.31 tree Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-19 9:18 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-19 10:05 ` Tejun Heo
2009-05-19 10:14 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-19 12:54 ` [PATCH version 2] " Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-19 12:54 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-20 1:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-20 8:11 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-20 12:54 ` James Smart
2009-05-20 14:37 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-20 14:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-20 14:47 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-20 16:20 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-20 16:39 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-20 16:40 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-20 16:43 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-20 16:59 ` Boaz Harrosh
2009-05-20 17:03 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2009-05-20 17:11 ` James Bottomley
2009-05-20 14:45 ` Stephen Rothwell
2009-05-20 19:10 ` Jens Axboe
2009-05-20 4:16 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A1437CC.1090108@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=James.Smart@Emulex.Com \
--cc=Jens.Axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tomof@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.