From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH] qemu: msi irq allocation api Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 17:01:42 +0300 Message-ID: <4A155EC6.6070501@redhat.com> References: <20090520162130.GA22109@redhat.com> <200905211423.20843.paul@codesourcery.com> <20090521134650.GI25309@redhat.com> <200905211453.14691.paul@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Carsten Otte , kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Rusty Russell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Christian Borntraeger To: Paul Brook Return-path: In-Reply-To: <200905211453.14691.paul@codesourcery.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+gceq-qemu-devel=gmane.org@nongnu.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Paul Brook wrote: >>> which is a trivial wrapper around stl_phys. >>> >> OK, but I'm adding another level of indirection in the middle, >> to allow us to tie in a kvm backend. >> > > kvm has no business messing with the PCI device code. > kvm has a fast path for irq injection. If qemu wants to support it we need some abstraction here. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function