From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: "Christian Bornträger" <borntrae@de.ibm.com>,
"Christian Ehrhardt" <ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Carsten Otte" <cotte@de.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] move irq protection role to separate lock v2
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 18:02:28 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A156D04.5020405@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090521143203.GA3358@amt.cnet>
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> x86 actually shares the same problem. KVM_IRQ_LINE interrupts may
>> arrive at any vcpu. Furthermore, with irqfd interrupts may be injected
>> from userspace (the vm process or other processes) or from the kernel
>> (assigned device, kernel virtio-net device). So we have the same
>> motivation to drop this lock and replace it by rcu for the fast paths.
>>
>
> OK, will use the lock to serialize individual ioctl commands that are
> not performance sensitive and need serialization.
>
Locks should protect data, not operations. Something named ioctl_lock
indicates something is wrong.
> Any objection to v2 of the irq_lock patch?
>
Haven't done a detailed review yet, sorry.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-21 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-18 16:56 [patch 0/4] move irq protection role to separate kvm->irq_lock Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-18 16:56 ` [patch 1/4] KVM: x86: grab pic lock in kvm_pic_clear_isr_ack Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-18 16:56 ` [patch 2/4] KVM: move coalesced_mmio locking to its own device Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-20 12:06 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-20 14:09 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-20 14:29 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-20 15:13 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-20 15:22 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-20 15:22 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-20 18:48 ` [patch 0/4] move irq protection role to separate lock v2 Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-20 18:48 ` [patch 1/4] KVM: x86: grab pic lock in kvm_pic_clear_isr_ack Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-20 18:48 ` [patch 2/4] KVM: move coalesced_mmio locking to its own device Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-24 14:04 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-25 11:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-26 11:24 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-26 13:15 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-26 13:27 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-20 18:48 ` [patch 3/4] KVM: introduce irq_lock, use it to protect ioapic Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-24 14:10 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-25 11:11 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-26 11:33 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-28 4:45 ` [patch 0/4] move irq protection role to separate lock v3 Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-28 4:45 ` [patch 1/4] KVM: x86: grab pic lock in kvm_pic_clear_isr_ack Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-28 4:45 ` [patch 2/4] KVM: move coalesced_mmio locking to its own device Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-31 12:14 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-01 21:23 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-01 21:43 ` Avi Kivity
2009-06-04 18:08 ` [patch 0/4] move irq protection role to separate lock v4 Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-04 18:08 ` [patch 1/4] KVM: x86: grab pic lock in kvm_pic_clear_isr_ack Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-04 18:08 ` [patch 2/4] KVM: move coalesced_mmio locking to its own device Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-04 18:08 ` [patch 3/4] KVM: introduce irq_lock, use it to protect ioapic Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-04 18:08 ` [patch 4/4] KVM: switch irq injection/acking data structures to irq_lock Marcelo Tosatti
2009-06-08 9:18 ` [patch 0/4] move irq protection role to separate lock v4 Avi Kivity
2009-05-28 4:45 ` [patch 3/4] KVM: introduce irq_lock, use it to protect ioapic Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-28 4:45 ` [patch 4/4] KVM: switch irq injection/acking data structures to irq_lock Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-20 18:48 ` [patch 4/4] KVM: switch irq injection/acking " Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-21 4:50 ` [patch 0/4] move irq protection role to separate lock v2 Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-21 6:55 ` Christian Bornträger
2009-05-21 7:26 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-21 14:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-21 15:02 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2009-05-18 16:56 ` [patch 3/4] KVM: introduce irq_lock, use it protect ioapic Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-20 12:11 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-20 14:11 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-20 14:29 ` Avi Kivity
2009-05-18 16:56 ` [patch 4/4] KVM: switch irq injection/acking to irq_lock Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-20 12:15 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-05-20 14:16 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2009-05-24 14:53 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A156D04.5020405@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=borntrae@de.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cotte@de.ibm.com \
--cc=ehrhardt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.