From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Sixt Subject: Re: can anybody explain the following to a git noob? Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:44:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4A16822A.2060404@viscovery.net> References: <855e4dcf0905212046o3e1d6ec6l487829a0a411dcaf@mail.gmail.com> <32541b130905212202q9aed54cn892171b7e654812f@mail.gmail.com> <855e4dcf0905212244r454a5c21w7bdbfb566a28efb8@mail.gmail.com> <4A1671E5.4030400@op5.se> <855e4dcf0905220335n367a065fidc65567119c0a5a3@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andreas Ericsson , Avery Pennarun , git@vger.kernel.org To: Tim Uckun X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 22 12:46:48 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M7SH1-00085w-MK for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 22 May 2009 12:46:48 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751413AbZEVKpA (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2009 06:45:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751376AbZEVKo7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2009 06:44:59 -0400 Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at ([212.33.55.13]:20060 "EHLO lilzmailso02.liwest.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751000AbZEVKo7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 May 2009 06:44:59 -0400 Received: from cm56-163-160.liwest.at ([86.56.163.160] helo=linz.eudaptics.com) by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1M7SFH-0005EU-B2; Fri, 22 May 2009 12:44:59 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (J6T.linz.viscovery [192.168.1.96]) by linz.eudaptics.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 170486B7; Fri, 22 May 2009 12:44:59 +0200 (CEST) User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) In-Reply-To: <855e4dcf0905220335n367a065fidc65567119c0a5a3@mail.gmail.com> X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Tim Uckun schrieb: > I still don't have an answer as to why the renamed test_new directory > exists master branch and why both the original 'test' directory and > the renamed 'test_new' directory are missing subdirectories. Did test_new contain ignored files? In this case, when you checkout the branch that does not have test_new, only the tracked files are removed; the ignored (i.e untracked) files remain. Therefore, after the checkout you still have a test_new directory. -- Hannes