From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question on lockdep and sysrq - d
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:42:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A177ECE.7080508@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d82e647a0905221803w487fcdb3k2319bdaa7d9cc559@mail.gmail.com>
Ming Lei wrote:
> See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124211522525625&w=2.
>
That is about some real bug in the official kernel. I am almost 100%
certain that my own code is at fault here.
I'm just trying to better understand the way lockdep prints out
all of the locks so I can easier debug my issue.
Thanks,
Ben
> thanks.
>
> 2009/5/23 Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'm trying to debug an apparent deadlock in some code I'm
>> writing.
>>
>> When I do a sysrq 'd', I get a nice dump of locks (I have lockdep enabled).
>>
>> However, the output appears to show multiple processes holding the
>> same locks (rtnl_mutex, for example):
>>
>> Showing all locks held in the system:
>> 3 locks held by events/11/63:
>> #0: (events){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8104f71e>] run_workqueue+0xb1/0x216
>> #1: ((linkwatch_work).work){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8104f71e>]
>> run_workqueue+0xb1/0x216
>> #2: (rtnl_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8125def1>] rtnl_lock+0x12/0x14
>> 1 lock held by irqbalance/3360:
>> #0: (rtnl_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8125def1>] rtnl_lock+0x12/0x14
>> 1 lock held by hald/3605:
>> #0: (rtnl_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8125def1>] rtnl_lock+0x12/0x14
>> ...
>>
>> Is this merely showing processes that are blocked on trying to acquire these
>> locks?
>>
>> If so, is there any way to tell which processes have fully acquired locks
>> v/s
>> just waiting to acquire them?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ben
>>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-23 4:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-23 0:31 Question on lockdep and sysrq - d Ben Greear
2009-05-23 1:03 ` Ming Lei
2009-05-23 4:42 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2009-05-23 12:33 ` Ming Lei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A177ECE.7080508@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.