From: Antoine Nourry <nourry@free.fr>
To: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Real-Time & Determinism
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 15:04:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A17F444.6070005@free.fr> (raw)
Hi to all,
why can we read everywhere that Preempt_RT offers hard real time
capabilities while on another hand we can find in some papers that it is
not deterministic and only gives assurance to obtain low latencies ? is
it real time or not (deterministic) ? if yes, is it hard or soft RT ?
Please excuse me if i've missed something important.
Thanks for your work,
Antoine
next reply other threads:[~2009-05-23 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-23 13:04 Antoine Nourry [this message]
2009-05-23 13:09 ` Real-Time & Determinism Leon Woestenberg
2009-05-23 13:58 ` Antoine Nourry
2009-05-26 23:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-05-28 1:21 ` Lee Revell
2009-05-28 10:16 ` nourry
2009-05-28 12:38 ` Luis Claudio R. Goncalves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A17F444.6070005@free.fr \
--to=nourry@free.fr \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.