From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [KVM-AUTOTEST PATCH] WinXP step files: add an optional barrier to deal with a closed start menu Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:31:22 +0300 Message-ID: <4A1A656A.9010102@redhat.com> References: <1939560113.327601243243744001.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sudhir kumar , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Goldish Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:55071 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752228AbZEYJbY (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 05:31:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1939560113.327601243243744001.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Michael Goldish wrote: > ----- "sudhir kumar" wrote: > > >> Any plans to add other windows stepfiles? >> > > Yes, we have plans to add Windows 7. We should also fix Win2008.64, which > has an incomplete step file. > > However, we will no longer rely on step files when we start using unattended > Linux and Windows installations. Step file tests will still have to run, > in my opinion, because they're the only tests that simulate physical user > interaction, but we won't have to run them as much as we do today, and we > won't have to keep a step file for every guest we want to install. So, in > other words, I'm not absolutely sure we'll have Windows 7 step files. It > depends on how well unattended installations will work, and how important it > will be to simulate user interaction with Windows 7. > They're important because they simulate a user's first interaction with kvm. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function