From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the x86 tree with Linus' tree Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 17:56:33 -0700 Message-ID: <4A1B3E41.5030003@zytor.com> References: <20090526105249.986c4f3c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:48061 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752775AbZEZA5C (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 20:57:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090526105249.986c4f3c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the x86 tree got a conflict in > arch/x86/boot/memory.c between commit > bca23dba760d6705c013f89113c46570378fb626 ("x86, setup: revert ACPI 3 E820 > extended attributes support") from Linus' tree and commit > df7699c56421c0476704f24a43409ac8c505f3d2 ("x86, setup: "glove box" BIOS > interrupts in the core boot code") from the x86 tree. > > The former removed the code that the latter modified, so I used the > former (as is done in -tip). tip:x86/setup should contain a proper merge between the two. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.